The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2013.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on the shape–velocity relationship of an ellipsoidal bubble in inorganic salt solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
17
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The average relative error σ d /d of the measured equivalent bubble diameters is 10%. Note that this error includes not only the experimental uncertainty but also bubble size variations arising from the bubble shape oscillation [25][26][27]. This is especially true for cases with large initial shape deformation where the bubble size depends on the rotation of the bubbles; bubbles seen from different angles will have different shapes due to waves traveling on the bubble-water interface.…”
Section: Bubble Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average relative error σ d /d of the measured equivalent bubble diameters is 10%. Note that this error includes not only the experimental uncertainty but also bubble size variations arising from the bubble shape oscillation [25][26][27]. This is especially true for cases with large initial shape deformation where the bubble size depends on the rotation of the bubbles; bubbles seen from different angles will have different shapes due to waves traveling on the bubble-water interface.…”
Section: Bubble Sizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be connected to an overall suppression of the shape oscillation, which is important for the terminal velocity [9]. Indeed, the conclusion was drawn from a recent study, which investigated single bubbles rising in different salt solutions, that NaCl has a distinct influence on the bubble shape [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations were considered as strong evidence against immobilizing effect of salts despite admitting that there are differences between the rise of a single bubble in a quiescent liquid and the thinning of a liquid film between two colliding bubbles. It is noted that the evidence that the bubble rise velocity in solutions of bubble coalescence inhibiting and non-inhibiting salts is the same as that in pure water is contradictory to the experimental results of Quinn et al (2014a). These contradictory evidences can be attributed to the salts purity since bubbles smaller than 1 mm in diameter show little effect of contamination on bubble size and velocity, while larger bubbles can undergo surface deformation affected by impurities via surface tension and surface viscoelastic properties of the air-water interface (Quinn et al, 2014a).…”
Section: Surface Rheologymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It is noted that the evidence that the bubble rise velocity in solutions of bubble coalescence inhibiting and non-inhibiting salts is the same as that in pure water is contradictory to the experimental results of Quinn et al (2014a). These contradictory evidences can be attributed to the salts purity since bubbles smaller than 1 mm in diameter show little effect of contamination on bubble size and velocity, while larger bubbles can undergo surface deformation affected by impurities via surface tension and surface viscoelastic properties of the air-water interface (Quinn et al, 2014a). Later the boundary condition of a liquid film between a rising bubble and a TiO2 solid surface during drainage was studied .…”
Section: Surface Rheologymentioning
confidence: 85%