Computational Mechanics 2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75999-7_51
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study on the Parameters That Cause River-Blocking by Debris Flow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no effective criterion has yet been established to judge whether a landslide dam forms. In previous studies (Dang et al 2009, Guo et al 2004, the time length of river blockage was used to evaluate whether a landslide dam forms. For example, Guo et al (2004) assumed that if the time length of river blockage was more than 3 s, a landslide dam might form in the laboratory-scale experiment.…”
Section: Evolution Process Of River Blockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, no effective criterion has yet been established to judge whether a landslide dam forms. In previous studies (Dang et al 2009, Guo et al 2004, the time length of river blockage was used to evaluate whether a landslide dam forms. For example, Guo et al (2004) assumed that if the time length of river blockage was more than 3 s, a landslide dam might form in the laboratory-scale experiment.…”
Section: Evolution Process Of River Blockingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that previous laboratory experiments were commonly used to investigate the mechanism of landslide dam breaks with manually prebuilt earth-rock dams (Chen et al 2015;Davies et al 2007;Gregoretti et al 2010;Niu et al 2012), very few studies have modeled the evolution process of river blocking. Although a few experimental studies on the formation conditions of landslide dams triggered by mud or debris flow have been reported (Dang et al 2009, Guo et al 2004), the applicability of those studies for non-cohesive landslide masses might need to be further examined because the evolution process of river blocking is entirely different among various landslide materials (Liao et al 2019), such as rock, gravel, and clay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researches on predictive method for debris flow blocking river were conducted [1][2][9][10][11][12][13] . But these predictive models have no universality because of too many factors to consider.…”
Section: Analysis Of River Blocked By Debris Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deposition range is determined by debris flow scales and local channel conditions [1] . If a debris flow scale is enough big while main riverway is narrow, the debris flow could block the main river [2] . There are many reports on debris flow blocking river events in mountain areas [3][4][5][6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1991, the relationship between channel conditions and river blocking was theoretically investigated [14]. The entry angle, discharge ratio to the main stream, and volumes of debris entering into the main stream proved to be important factors for the formation of river blockings [15,16]. In order to measure the extent of river blocking, the runout momentum of debris flow as nondimensional factor was chosen [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%