2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2010.07.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on the improvement of CO2 air conditioning system performance using an ejector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lee et al [4] experimentally discovered that the COP of the ejector-expansion cycle was approximately 15% higher than that of the reference cycle. Through the experiment, Liu et al [5] found that the maximum COP gain by the introduction of the ejector in a transcritical CO 2 refrigeration cycle could reach 36%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al [4] experimentally discovered that the COP of the ejector-expansion cycle was approximately 15% higher than that of the reference cycle. Through the experiment, Liu et al [5] found that the maximum COP gain by the introduction of the ejector in a transcritical CO 2 refrigeration cycle could reach 36%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig. 11, at the same operating conditions, Lee at al. (2011) found that the system with the ejector caused the pressure in the compressor inlet (point 1′) to be higher than that (point 1) of a SC system.…”
Section: Ejector As An Expansion Devicementioning
confidence: 63%
“…Yan et al (2013) determined that the COP of the combined ejector-vapor compression cycle based on R134a and air-cooled condenser improves by approximately 15.9-21.0 %. Studies on the performance of a CO 2 A/C system using the ejector as an expansion device by Lee et al (2014) also indicated that the cooling capacity and COP in the A/C system using an ejector are higher than those in the conventional system at an 11 p-h diagrams in CO 2 A/C system using and ejector and conventional/SC system (Lee at al. 2011) entrainment ratio greater than 0.76.…”
Section: Ejector As An Expansion Devicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee et al [18] presented the experimental results of the R744 ejector expansion refrigeration system, and found that the choked flow appeared when the motive nozzle throat diameter is less than 1.0 mm, but disappeared when the nozzle throat diameter is over 1.0 mm. Chaiwongsa and Wongwises [19] investigated the effects of throat diameter of the motive nozzle on the performance of R134a ejector expansion refrigeration system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%