2021
DOI: 10.1002/er.6497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on the effect of different surfactants on the thermophysical properties of graphene filled nanofluids

Abstract: Summary In this study, the effects of different surfactants on the stability and thermophysical properties of graphene (GR) filled water (W) nanofluids were investigated in an experimental manner. Nanofluids filled by 0.05% mass fraction of GR nanoparticles with a surfactant concentration of 0.02%, 0.04%, 0.06%, 0.08%, and 0.1% were studied. The effects of surfactants on stability, viscosity, and thermophysical properties of prepared nanofluids were analyzed experimentally. The results show that the nonionic s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While many studies have concluded that adding a surfactant will increase the viscosity of the nanofluid; other studies have observed the opposite effect. Qiao et al [ 36 ] observed the change in viscosity with increasing temperature for six different surfactants added to a base fluid of water and graphene nanoparticles. The surfactants used were tested in concentrations of 0.02%, 0.04%, 0.06%, 0.08%, and 0.1% and could be classified into the following three groups: anionic (SDBS, SDS, and PAAS), nonionic (PVP), and cationic (OTAB and CTAB).…”
Section: Brief Review On Optimization Of Effects Of Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While many studies have concluded that adding a surfactant will increase the viscosity of the nanofluid; other studies have observed the opposite effect. Qiao et al [ 36 ] observed the change in viscosity with increasing temperature for six different surfactants added to a base fluid of water and graphene nanoparticles. The surfactants used were tested in concentrations of 0.02%, 0.04%, 0.06%, 0.08%, and 0.1% and could be classified into the following three groups: anionic (SDBS, SDS, and PAAS), nonionic (PVP), and cationic (OTAB and CTAB).…”
Section: Brief Review On Optimization Of Effects Of Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surfactants used were tested in concentrations of 0.02%, 0.04%, 0.06%, 0.08%, and 0.1% and could be classified into the following three groups: anionic (SDBS, SDS, and PAAS), nonionic (PVP), and cationic (OTAB and CTAB). Qiao et al [ 36 ] found that the addition of surfactant increases the viscosity of the nanofluid. Higher concentrations of surfactant were also correlated with higher viscosity.…”
Section: Brief Review On Optimization Of Effects Of Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 These nanoparticle-laden fluids are usually termed nanofluids. [8][9][10] For applications in DASCs, nanofluids, even at low concentrations, can significantly improve the collector's performance. Therefore, nanofluids are promising alternatives to the commonly used fluids in DASCs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating nanoparticles with high light absorption capability into the fluids has been proved a practical approach to enhance the optical characteristics of the base fluids 6,7 . These nanoparticle‐laden fluids are usually termed nanofluids 8‐10 . For applications in DASCs, nanofluids, even at low concentrations, can significantly improve the collector's performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific heat and thermal conductivity values were 2.37, 2.31 kJ/kg K, and .117, .119 W/mK, respectively. Stability of water‐based nanofluid was studied using UV‐visible spectrophotometer by Qiao et al 25 . The authors used different surfactants, and among them, polyvinylpyrrolidone gave better stability and a maximum absorbance of .5, whichwas almost constant even after 20 days for the mass fraction of .04%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%