2022
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c04155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study on the Difference of Fluid Flow between Methane Hydrate-Bearing Sand and Clay Sediments

Abstract: The gas−water seepage of natural gas hydrate sediments in the South China Sea significantly influences the efficiency of reservoir production of water/gas. However, there are significant differences between gas and water flow in methane hydrate-bearing sand and clay sediments. In this study, a series of permeability experiments were carried out in quartz and montmorillonite sediments in the presence of methane hydrate. The experiment results indicated that gas permeability decreases with increasing effective s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent times, most laboratory flow tests have been performed on coarse-grained sediments, but only very few flow tests have been conducted for the fine-grained host sediments [30,31,[144][145][146]. Therefore, due to the lack of reliable experimental permeability data, it is difficult to determine whether the existing permeability prediction models in the literature are suitable for fine-grained sediments or not.…”
Section: Fine-grained Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent times, most laboratory flow tests have been performed on coarse-grained sediments, but only very few flow tests have been conducted for the fine-grained host sediments [30,31,[144][145][146]. Therefore, due to the lack of reliable experimental permeability data, it is difficult to determine whether the existing permeability prediction models in the literature are suitable for fine-grained sediments or not.…”
Section: Fine-grained Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of investigations were undertaken by scholars to characterize hydrate-bearing sediments considering multiple factors from the perspective of permeability. One crucial recognition is that hydrate content is scattered in the pore space of sediments, which is rendered with negative correlation to permeability. , Furthermore, the decreasing tendency of effective permeability with increasing hydrate saturation is validated experimentally to be diverse with the functions of the pore-scale environment, such as sediments’ particle size, porosity, suffered effective stress, and hydrate morphology. Typically, hydrate morphology is a vital permeability-related factor in view of hydrate reservoir formation and NGH exploitation, in which two typical forms represented by grain-cementing and pore-filling morphologies are introduced to hydrate permeability models, including the Parallel Capillary Model, Kozeny Grain Model, and Hybrid Model, and their modification. However, the correlation between permeability and hydrate morphology is mostly established by model calculations based on computed tomography imaging or theoretical hypothesis, and there are few laboratory experiments taking this into account. For in situ NGH deposited in natural hydrate-stabilized zones, massive references point out that pore-filling or fracture-filling hydrate-bearing silty-clayey sediments (HBSCSs) below the seabed occupy vast reserves in contrast to other hydrate reservoirs. To this end, determining the seepage characteristics of HBSCSs with different hydrate morphologies in laboratory pore scale is essential for gaining insight into the numerical simulation and model verification of hydrate reservoirs, as well as provides gas and water recovery prediction over long-term hydrate production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%