2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2017.03.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on screwed connections for sheathed CFS structures with gypsum or cement based panels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies have been particularly concentrated on connections between CFS profiles and sheathing panels, as represented by research carried out in the US by Vieira and Schafer [38] and Peterman et al [39] on wood and gypsum-based sheathing connections, and by Swensen at al. [40] on gypsum sheathing connections; tests performed on different typologies of boards in China [41], i.e., wood, gypsum, magnesium, and calcium silicate boards; studies on gypsum-based sheathing connections carried out in Italy [42,43]. The main results of available studies on sheathing panel-to-steel connections demonstrate that the type of sheathing had a significant effect on the shear response of connections: pull-through is dominant for wood-based sheathing connections (Figure 11a), which show a comparatively larger strength and energy dissipation capacity; whereas, bearing is dominant for gypsum-based sheathing connections (Figure 11b), which show a relatively larger stiffness and ductility.…”
Section: Ongoing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have been particularly concentrated on connections between CFS profiles and sheathing panels, as represented by research carried out in the US by Vieira and Schafer [38] and Peterman et al [39] on wood and gypsum-based sheathing connections, and by Swensen at al. [40] on gypsum sheathing connections; tests performed on different typologies of boards in China [41], i.e., wood, gypsum, magnesium, and calcium silicate boards; studies on gypsum-based sheathing connections carried out in Italy [42,43]. The main results of available studies on sheathing panel-to-steel connections demonstrate that the type of sheathing had a significant effect on the shear response of connections: pull-through is dominant for wood-based sheathing connections (Figure 11a), which show a comparatively larger strength and energy dissipation capacity; whereas, bearing is dominant for gypsum-based sheathing connections (Figure 11b), which show a relatively larger stiffness and ductility.…”
Section: Ongoing Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a sheathed wall is subjected to compressive or lateral loads -or a combination of these two -shear and pull-through forces develop at the interface between the stud and the board, leading to their relative slip and separation, respectively [8][9][10]. Resistance to these forces is provided by the employed connection, while rotation and twisting of the elements is restrained mainly through contact [4,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nithyadharan and Kalyanaraman (2011) and Ye et al (2016) presented experimental studies on screw connections between CFS and calcium silicate boards (CSB). Fiorino et al (2008Fiorino et al ( , 2017aFiorino et al ( , 2017b, Swensen et al (2015), and Shahi et al (2013) presented experimental studies on cement-based boards (CB). Ye et al (2016) performed an experimental study on screw connections of Bolivian magnesium board (MGB).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%