2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.04.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on residual axial bearing capacity of UHPFRC-filled steel tubes after lateral impact loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the study included six major parameters (1) type of concrete, (2) ratio of steel, (3) form of section, (4) ratio of axial load, (5) impact energy and (6) subjected or not subjected to impact loading. Finally, Mi et al [3] has observed the below:…”
Section: Concrete Filled Double Skin Steel Tubular (Cfdst) Structural Elementsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the study included six major parameters (1) type of concrete, (2) ratio of steel, (3) form of section, (4) ratio of axial load, (5) impact energy and (6) subjected or not subjected to impact loading. Finally, Mi et al [3] has observed the below:…”
Section: Concrete Filled Double Skin Steel Tubular (Cfdst) Structural Elementsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Mi et al [3] did an experimental investigation on ten CFST samples to determine the residual axial bearing capacity (Rabc) under lateral impact load. Besides, the ten CFST samples consisted of seven Concrete-Filled Double-skin steel tubes (CFDST) and three normal single skin CFST samples.…”
Section: Concrete Filled Double Skin Steel Tubular (Cfdst) Structural Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, CFST columns had lower maximum deflection under impact load when compared to hollow tubes (Figures 30,31). Feng et al [165] tested 36 circular stainless-steel tubes under in-plane bending. Moreover, the specimens had two variables, for example, the first variable was between hollow and concrete filled stainless steel tubes and the second variable was bare/ unstrengthen specimens and CFRP strengthened specimens.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%