2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on glass edge machining flaw characterization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MOR (σ0) and Weibull modulus (m) of annealed and chemically strengthened auliminosilicate glass was also obtained as shown in Table 1. Well-controlled edge machining leaves flaws within 20~30 μm [24]. The DOL of ~20 μm cannot ensure that these machining flaws are fully enveloped with the CS, thereby causing the small Weibull modulus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MOR (σ0) and Weibull modulus (m) of annealed and chemically strengthened auliminosilicate glass was also obtained as shown in Table 1. Well-controlled edge machining leaves flaws within 20~30 μm [24]. The DOL of ~20 μm cannot ensure that these machining flaws are fully enveloped with the CS, thereby causing the small Weibull modulus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annealed glass has a linear elastic behaviour: annealed float glass has a modulus of elasticity of 70 GPa, and a bending strength of 30-80 MPa Feldmann et al (2014). The bending strength of glass has a high variability because it is a brittle material, and its breakage is mainly due to the presence of small surface flaws randomly scattered To et al (2008), which may appear during the manufacturing, transportation, assembly or service life of glass elements Lindqvist and Louter (2014). When a critical stress or strain is surpassed, the surface flaws grow uncontrollably Griffith (1921).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For studies concerning the edge flaws of glass specimens, we refer to the work of e.g. Lindqvist [20]. Figure 3 shows two assembled specimens of medium size after failure; the specimen in Figure 3a failed at the edge and the specimen in Figure 3b, at the face.…”
Section: Quasi-static Four-point Bending Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%