“…Moreover, going more in detail, it is possible to highlight different trends. Liu et al 7B [50] obtained a reduction of only 4% of the compression strength with a substitution of the aggregate fraction with rubber of 7 vol.%., whereas other studies reported at least 15% reduction for the same amount of rubber (1AB, 3AB, 5AB, 6A, 8A, 11A, 12A, 13AB [44,46,48,49,51,[54][55][56]). The works written by Zheng et al, 10AB, [53] and Najim et al, 27ABC, [57] also report interesting performances, with a lower reduction of compression strength than most of the case studies here analyzed (moreover, this difference is more evident when increasing the amount of rubber inside the composites).…”