2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2017.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on debris bed characteristics for the sedimentation behavior of solid particles used as simulant debris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) Further experimental investigations and modeling verifications (or developments) in the case of other initial bed shapes. According to the recent visualization experimental and modeling research on debris bed formation behavior [8,12,[56][57][58], it was clarified that under different parametric conditions with considerations of a typical CDA of SFR, not only the convex bed, but also the flat, concave and trapezoid beds would possibly form due to the different interparticle and particle-fluid interactions. However, in the past self-leveling investigations, it was assumed that the particle bed was initially convex, which was inadequate to take all possible initial debris bed shapes into account.…”
Section: Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) Further experimental investigations and modeling verifications (or developments) in the case of other initial bed shapes. According to the recent visualization experimental and modeling research on debris bed formation behavior [8,12,[56][57][58], it was clarified that under different parametric conditions with considerations of a typical CDA of SFR, not only the convex bed, but also the flat, concave and trapezoid beds would possibly form due to the different interparticle and particle-fluid interactions. However, in the past self-leveling investigations, it was assumed that the particle bed was initially convex, which was inadequate to take all possible initial debris bed shapes into account.…”
Section: Future Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, as shown in Figure 1, along with the fast quenching and fragmentation, the molten materials will become solid debris and accumulate on the core-support structure in the lower part of the reactor vessel to form the debris bed [10,11]. To achieve In-Vessel Retention (IVR), which is primely essential for SFR, it is necessary to ensure the adequate cooling of the debris beds and their neutronically subcritical conguration [12,13]. Nevertheless, it was recognized that the sodium coolant is probably heated and boiled by the hightemperature accumulated debris with decay heat, causing the interactions between bubbles and solid debris within debris beds [10,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the debris bed configurations are of great essence to neutr criticality and self-sustainable long-term coolability, adequate comprehensive eva for debris relocation in the CDA of an SFR are necessary to realize the In-Vessel R (IVR) for fuel debris [28][29][30]. On the other hand, focusing on the IVR of SFRs, safety equipment (e.g., core catchers) is also recommended for employment below actor vessel to enlarge the safety margin [26,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these in tions, the self-leveling mechanisms (e.g., bubble-particle interactions within partic and characteristics (e.g., parametric influence on the leveling rate) were clarifie ever, it should be noted that the complex multiphase flows, including solid debri coolant, and sodium vapor, involved in the DBF process can result in varyin shapes of the debris bed, which in turn can influence the progression of severe a in SFRs. Hence, it Is of great importance to understand the characteristics and mec Considering that the debris bed configurations are of great essence to neutronic recriticality and self-sustainable long-term coolability, adequate comprehensive evaluations for debris relocation in the CDA of an SFR are necessary to realize the In-Vessel Retention (IVR) for fuel debris [28][29][30]. On the other hand, focusing on the IVR of SFRs, relevant safety equipment (e.g., core catchers) is also recommended for employment below the reactor vessel to enlarge the safety margin [26,31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental investigations with simulant materials composed of homogeneous solid particles were conducted recently [12,13] and, in connection with this study, an exploration was performed in our previous studies for mixtures of particles with different properties [14,15]. These experimental analyses discovered the nature of the shape characteristics of the particle bed and its dependence on some important factors, such as particle density and diameter as well as the diameter and length of the nozzle, which is used to discharge solid particles into the water pool [12][13][14][15]. As the experimental process consumes a high cost and long duration, the evaluation of such sedimentation behaviors is performed knowing the limited scope of reproducibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%