2009
DOI: 10.1002/stc.330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study on adjustable tuned mass damper to reduce floor vibration due to machinery

Abstract: This paper deals with the optimum design of a tuned mass damper (TMD) for the mitigation of machine-induced vertical vibration of structures. Theoretically, a TMD without damping tuning to the machine operating frequency will make optimum control performance. Considering zero damping is impossible, a new field-based design procedure and an adjustable vertically moving TMD (VTMD) are proposed. The VTMD is composed of variable mass blocks and changeable springs. A prototype of the VTMD was fabricated and tested … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from Figure 4 that the experimental results match best with the analytic curve when n = 1.3 and the pounding stiffness of HEDR material layer can be obtained to 2.19 × 10 5 N/m 1.3 by substituting n = 1.3 into Equation (11). Furthermore, based on the classic impact theory and the conservation of energy, the coefficient of restitution e can be calculated by 49…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen from Figure 4 that the experimental results match best with the analytic curve when n = 1.3 and the pounding stiffness of HEDR material layer can be obtained to 2.19 × 10 5 N/m 1.3 by substituting n = 1.3 into Equation (11). Furthermore, based on the classic impact theory and the conservation of energy, the coefficient of restitution e can be calculated by 49…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 66%
“…When a free pounding experiment was performed by giving the pendulum mass an initial displacement x d0 = 50.0 mm, the experimental history of impact force can be obtained in Figure 3. The preimpact velocity is 0.157 m/s from Equation (13), and the maximum impact force f e is 116.8 N. Then, a certain value of n is assumed such as n = 1.5, and the pounding stiffness can be calculated from Equation (11). By substituting the obtained value of pounding stiffness into Equation (12), the relationships between the pounding duration and the preimpact velocity under different nonlinear coefficients n are plotted in Figure 4.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Emiliano et al [37] introduced the robust design of mass-uncertain rolling-pendulum TMDs for the seismic protection of buildings. Chang et al [38] presented the experimental study on adjustable TMD to reduce floor vibrations due to machinery. Berardengo et al [39] introduced the modelling and control of an adaptive TMD based on shape memory alloys and eddy currents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matta et al developed mass‐uncertain rolling‐pendulum TMDs for the seismic protection of buildings. Chang et al proposed a new field‐based design procedure and an adjustable vertically moving TMD, which composed of variable mass blocks and changeable springs. Casado et al studied a control system for an adaptive tuned mass damper for self‐climbing formworks, which can be used in some critical construction phases of concrete piers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%