1925
DOI: 10.6028/nbsscipaper.207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study of the relation between intermittent and nonintermittent sector-wheel photographic exposures

Abstract: This investigation on the effects of intermittent sector-wheel photographic exposures was prompted by data obtained some years ago which were not in agreement with the results of other investigators. It is the accepted view that, compared with a continuous exposure, intermittance always causes a loss in photographic effect. The data shown here prove that the effect may be either a gain, a loss, or zero, dependent on the illumination. The illumination appears to control certain properties of the latent image no… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1930
1930
1944
1944

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal similarity between them is that a photochemical reaction forms one link in a complex chemical cycle, and that in each case the cycle, although widely different in most respects, permits an enhancement phenomenon to occur. Data which may be interpreted as evidence of enhancement in photochemical cycles are not limited to photosynthesis and human vision, but they have also been noted for vision of arthropods by Mast, Dolley and others (23,15) and for photographic plates by Davis (14). Unfortunately, no apparent attempt has been made to link the arthropod data with the photochemical cycle, but there seems to be no reason for necessarily considering this effect for arthropods as being caused by the refractory period of the sense cells or of the nervous elements as proposed by Mast (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The principal similarity between them is that a photochemical reaction forms one link in a complex chemical cycle, and that in each case the cycle, although widely different in most respects, permits an enhancement phenomenon to occur. Data which may be interpreted as evidence of enhancement in photochemical cycles are not limited to photosynthesis and human vision, but they have also been noted for vision of arthropods by Mast, Dolley and others (23,15) and for photographic plates by Davis (14). Unfortunately, no apparent attempt has been made to link the arthropod data with the photochemical cycle, but there seems to be no reason for necessarily considering this effect for arthropods as being caused by the refractory period of the sense cells or of the nervous elements as proposed by Mast (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%