1994
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.50.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of the reactionppppπ0in the energy range 600–900 MeV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Δ(1232) decay has been modeled proportional to 1 + 3 cos 2 (θ), where θ is the angle of the pion (or nucleon) in the Δ rest frame with respect to the beam axis. Such a parametrization is predicted by the OPE model and also corroborated by the experimental data [34].…”
Section: Simulations and Acceptance Corrections 31 Event Generationsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The Δ(1232) decay has been modeled proportional to 1 + 3 cos 2 (θ), where θ is the angle of the pion (or nucleon) in the Δ rest frame with respect to the beam axis. Such a parametrization is predicted by the OPE model and also corroborated by the experimental data [34].…”
Section: Simulations and Acceptance Corrections 31 Event Generationsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The dominance of the intermediate Δ(1232) production and the peripheral character of the reaction, which increases with energy, stand out very clearly in this region. Comparison of the shape of various differential distributions from both exclusive reactions pp → ppπ 0 and pp → pnπ + in the range 0.6-0.94 GeV to calculations within the one-pion exchange (OPE) show a nice agreement [10,11]. However, the magnitude of the crosssections for both reactions, regardless of the choice of the form of π-nucleon interaction, is explained by the models within an accuracy of 20-30% only.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Meanwhile, also the precision of the measurements of differential distributions, which is essential for unravelling the reaction mechanism, has been improved [9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The dominance of the intermediate Δ(1232) production and the peripheral character of the reaction, which increases with energy, stand out very clearly in this region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the model proposed by Suslenko and Gaisak [8], the dominance of the one-pion exchange term was assumed leading to a qualitatively well description of experimental data collected in the energy range 0.6 − 1.0 GeV. The analysis of one-pion production channels in reactions pp → ppπ 0 and pp → npπ + (see [9][10][11][12]) leads to a good description of various differential distributions, yet the total cross sections predicted by the model are lower than the reconstructed from the experimental data. Another model describing the data in the npπ + channel in the quite wide energy range 0.97 − 4.0 GeV (see [13][14][15]), introduced by Dmitriev, Sushkov and Gaarde [16], had essentially similar assumptions of one-pion exchange but different vertex parameterization.…”
Section: Elementary Reactions and Their Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%