2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnggs.2015.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of the impact on methane adsorption capacity of continental shales with thermal evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature data have shown that gas absorption capacity is influenced by many factors, including geochemical parameters, such as the total organic matter content (TOC), kerogen types, as well as thermal maturity [1,2,5,6], pore volume and pore size distribution [1,7], petrological and mineralogical factors [8,9], and environmental factors such as the buried temperature and pressure. Although some researchers observed that absorption capacity decreases with the increase of the TOC [10], it is generally accepted that organic matter is the primary control factor in the adsorbed gas volume and is positively correlated with the TOC [11][12][13][14]. In addition, the adsorbed gas volume increases with the confining pressure, whereas it decreases inversely to the temperature [9,[15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Literature data have shown that gas absorption capacity is influenced by many factors, including geochemical parameters, such as the total organic matter content (TOC), kerogen types, as well as thermal maturity [1,2,5,6], pore volume and pore size distribution [1,7], petrological and mineralogical factors [8,9], and environmental factors such as the buried temperature and pressure. Although some researchers observed that absorption capacity decreases with the increase of the TOC [10], it is generally accepted that organic matter is the primary control factor in the adsorbed gas volume and is positively correlated with the TOC [11][12][13][14]. In addition, the adsorbed gas volume increases with the confining pressure, whereas it decreases inversely to the temperature [9,[15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason for this is that the internal surface area and the adsorption energy of the small pores is higher than the large pores [1,6,7,18]. Nevertheless, recent reports revealed that the mesopores and macropores are also good places for methane adsorption [10,14,19], and some observed a negative correlation between the adsorbed gas volume and the porosity [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In experiment, there are two commonly used methods to study gas adsorption: gravimetric and volumetric method. Gravimetric method uses magnetic suspension balance to obtain adsorption isotherms 15 . It measures the excess adsorption capacity based on the difference between gravity and buoyancy 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations were performed at standard temperature and the pressure was calculated based on Ping Robinson equation of state (EOS) (Peng and Robinson, 1976) by inserting specific number of gas molecules to satisfy the required density. One hundred molecules of CH 4 were inserted in the system free of water to match a pressure of about 125 bar which was studied experimentally to represent the shale pressure (Zhong et al, 2016;Xing et al, 2018). Number of CO 2 molecules was chosen as an equimolar of methane for comparison purposes.…”
Section: Simulation Details and Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%