2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2009.06.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of the effect of bubbles on nucleation during batch cooling crystallization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
79
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
6
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, more nuclei are formed and the nucleation rate is increased. The hypothesis of the bubble as a nucleation center considers cavitation bubbles as heterogeneous particles which lower the work needed for nucleation and hence introduce heterogeneous nucleation [16,30,42]. Finally, the segregation theory states that when a cavitation bubble collapses, the inward motion of the liquid is stopped violently by the gas recompression in the bubble.…”
Section: Nucleation In Batch Versus Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, more nuclei are formed and the nucleation rate is increased. The hypothesis of the bubble as a nucleation center considers cavitation bubbles as heterogeneous particles which lower the work needed for nucleation and hence introduce heterogeneous nucleation [16,30,42]. Finally, the segregation theory states that when a cavitation bubble collapses, the inward motion of the liquid is stopped violently by the gas recompression in the bubble.…”
Section: Nucleation In Batch Versus Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound has been widely reported to influence the primary nucleation process accelerating nucleation kinetics, this is typically expressed in terms of reducing the induction time and MSZW [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Ultrasound can also increase the rate of secondary nucleation, this is manifested as a reduction on the product crystal size distribution [20,22,24,31,32,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]. Ultrasound can also influence crystal growth [20,25,26,36,40,[44][45][46] although the effect on crystal growth is not as dramatic as on nucleation and arises largely from enhanced mass transfer [46] and can influence crystal morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, individual crystals arise due to fragmentation and disaggregation of larger crystals or aggregates [57][58][59]. On the other hand, cavitation bubbles can also act as direct nucleation sites to enhance the nuclei number [30,60]. Although this will result in smaller particles that are more prone to aggregation, the high particle loading will also effectively disrupt aggregates due to the increased number of collisions.…”
Section: Targeted Ultrasonic Treatment At Seeding Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of this technology for crystallization were demonstrated before and include reduced metastable zone width, narrow particle size distribution and homogeneous crystal morphology [5,[26][27][28]. Although the exact mechanism of these phenomena is not yet understood, the proposed hypotheses attribute this to acoustic cavitation, involving the formation and implosion of micron-sized bubbles, and its accompanying mechanical effects [29,30]. Additional work on the effect of ultrasound during crystallization indicated that agglomeration can be suppressed, yielding individual crystals with a smooth surface [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%