1996
DOI: 10.1080/09542299.1996.11083261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of the combined effects of pH and salinity on the bioaccumulation of inorganic mercury in the crayfishAstacus leptodactylus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For MeHg, a plateau was reached after 40 d: the differences between the three average concentrations measured at 40, 60, and 80 d are not statistically significant (one‐way ANOVA and least‐square deviation test). For Hg(II), the plateau was less distinctive: only the averages measured after 60 and 80 d of exposure were not statistically different; however, they were significantly higher than those at 40 d. These results are in agreement with earlier studies carried out in comparable conditions, with Hg concentrations that were nevertheless considerably higher in the water column [21]. These two accumulation kinetics enable us to determine bioconcentration factors ([Hg] soft body (fresh weight) /[Hg] d or [Hg] Tot (water) ) at the plateau phase (60 or 80 d).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For MeHg, a plateau was reached after 40 d: the differences between the three average concentrations measured at 40, 60, and 80 d are not statistically significant (one‐way ANOVA and least‐square deviation test). For Hg(II), the plateau was less distinctive: only the averages measured after 60 and 80 d of exposure were not statistically different; however, they were significantly higher than those at 40 d. These results are in agreement with earlier studies carried out in comparable conditions, with Hg concentrations that were nevertheless considerably higher in the water column [21]. These two accumulation kinetics enable us to determine bioconcentration factors ([Hg] soft body (fresh weight) /[Hg] d or [Hg] Tot (water) ) at the plateau phase (60 or 80 d).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results are in agreement with the data available in the literature for other species of crustaceans. Thus, the gills represent the route via which the Hg(II) entered the organism and the gills have a very high accumulation capacity, given that they have a vast surface area for exchanges with the external environment and the almost permanent renewal of water in the gill cavity [21,24,25]. Autometallography studies on the gills of the common shore crab ( Carcinus maenas ) after direct exposure of the organisms or contamination of isolated and perfused gills, have shown that Hg(II) was accumulated in the superficial layers of the cuticule and within vacuoles in the nephrocytes, with this cell type playing an important phagocytic role [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is commonly thought that the main route of entry of trace metals from the ambient medium is the gill epithelium, and recent studies have shown that this is indeed the case for mercury in crabs (Barradas & Pequeux 1996. Furthermore, a number of other studies indicate that the gill tissue of several crustacean species is able to accumulate very high amounts of mercury following direct contamination from the ambient water (McLusky & Bryant 1986, Canli & Furness 1995, Wright 1995, Laporte et al 1996. In the shore crab Carcinus maenas for example, 15 d exposure to 1 µg l -1 of either inorganic or methylmercury resulted in gill bioconcentration factors of up to 1500 -3000, corresponding to gill metal concentrations that were 10 to 50 times higher than in the carapace and internal organs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gills were also identified as the second organ after the hepatopancreas, able to accumulate metals after exposure to high concentration (Rainbow, 1995;Laporte et al, 1996;Soegianto et al, 1999). They are involved in removing foreign particles (Martin et al, 2000), and in penaeid shrimp they are the major site of removal of foreign materials, because shrimps lack fixed phagocytes in haemal spaces of the digestive gland (Martin et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%