2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of the anisotropic behaviour of the Naparima Hill argillite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most researchers define the anisotropy ratio (AR) as the ratio between the rock properties measured vertically to the stratified structures and those measured parallel to the stratified structure . For example, some researchers prefer to define the strength AR as the ratio of the obtained shale compressive strength between 90° and 0° as expressed in eq .…”
Section: Results Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most researchers define the anisotropy ratio (AR) as the ratio between the rock properties measured vertically to the stratified structures and those measured parallel to the stratified structure . For example, some researchers prefer to define the strength AR as the ratio of the obtained shale compressive strength between 90° and 0° as expressed in eq .…”
Section: Results Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most researchers define the anisotropy ratio (AR) as the ratio between the rock properties measured vertically to the stratified structures and those measured parallel to the stratified structure. 35 For example, some researchers prefer to define the strength AR as the ratio of the obtained shale compressive strength between 90° and 0° as expressed in eq 2 . In contrast, some other researchers prefer to adopt the AR defined as the ratio of the obtained index of mechanical properties between the maximum value and the minimum value, as expressed in eq 3 : …”
Section: Results Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these theories and experiments rely on conventional triaxial stress (σ 1 > σ 2 = σ 3 ) and do not accurately represent the actual three-dimensional stress state, neglecting the significant influence of intermediate principal stress σ 2 on rock deformation and strength. Numerous in situ stress measurements demonstrate significant anisotropy in stress from shallow to middepth levels (σ 1 > σ 2 > σ 3 ) [8][9][10][11]. The confirmed influence of σ 2 on the compressive strength of jointed rock mass underscores the importance of conducting physical and mechanical property tests under true triaxial stress conditions.…”
Section: Of 18mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= σ3) and do not accurately represent the actual three-dimensional stress state, ne the significant influence of intermediate principal stress σ2 on rock deformat strength. Numerous in situ stress measurements demonstrate significant aniso stress from shallow to mid-depth levels (σ1 > σ2 > σ3) [8][9][10][11]. The confirmed influen on the compressive strength of jointed rock mass underscores the importance of c ing physical and mechanical property tests under true triaxial stress condition Mogi developed the first genuine rock triaxial testing machine in 1980 [12], res including Zhou et al and Chen et al have extensively studied marble [13,14], lim shale, sandstone, and granite using triaxial testing equipment [15].…”
Section: Of 18mentioning
confidence: 99%