Experimental study of second sound quench detection for superconducting cavities

Abstract

Superconducting rf cavities are used in particle accelerators to provide energy to the particle beam. Such cavities are mostly fabricated in niobium and often operated in superfluid helium. One of their limits of operation is the appearance of a local quench, initiated by a local field enhancement due to a defect, which leads to a normal conducting transition of the cavity. Localizing the quench area can be achieved with temperature mapping systems. Another method is the use of second sound wave propagation in superfluid helium. Measuring the time of propagation of these waves from quench location to special sensors, called oscillating superleak transducers (OSTs), and using their well-known velocity should allow trilateration. However, most of the experimental measurements on cavities show premature signals, i.e., the second sound signals arrive earlier on the OSTs than expected. This paper presents several quench experiments on cavities equipped with OSTs and temperature mapping quench detection systems. Two hypotheses can explain the observed premature signals. The first one assesses faster propagation in helium. An experimental setup has been developed for testing this hypothesis, where second sound is created by a localized heater in a controlled environment up to 4.3 kW=cm 2 and 2.8 J. Premature signals could not be verified in this setup. A second hypothesis based on a simple model including several processes in niobium and second sound propagation in helium is discussed. The model improves significantly the prediction of the times of arrival of the second sound waves. The overall study shows that the processes in niobium play a prominent role in the second sound detection for superconducting cavities.

Stereoscopic molecular tagging for superconducting accelerator-cavity quench spot detection

“…However, the reliability of this method is questioned by a puzzling observation that the triangulation does not converge on the cavity surface unless a secondsound velocity c 2 higher than literature values is assumed [3,16]. Despite extensive research on this puzzle [17][18][19][20][21][22], there still lacks a consensus, and the spatial resolution of the triangulation method is limited to about 1 cm [2].…”