2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of pullout capacity of plate anchors shallowly embedded in hydrate bearing sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(S u /p 0 ) OC S u /p 0 = OCR Λ (10) where parameter Λ relates to changes in the e of specimens during overconsolidation, which is equal to (λ − κ)/λ. In this study, Λ is calculated to be 0.83 according to λ = 0.175 and κ = 0.029, as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Effects Of Ocr On S U /Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(S u /p 0 ) OC S u /p 0 = OCR Λ (10) where parameter Λ relates to changes in the e of specimens during overconsolidation, which is equal to (λ − κ)/λ. In this study, Λ is calculated to be 0.83 according to λ = 0.175 and κ = 0.029, as shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Effects Of Ocr On S U /Pmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sediments within the installed piles or anchors are normally considered to be remolded and would reconsolidate with time after installation [8]. Since it is well known that changes in porosities due to consolidation obviously affects the shear strength of unconsolidated sediments [9], the resultant changes in undrained shear strength (hereafter S u ) are required to access the stability of suction piles for various submarine engineering projects [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In experimental study, Ilamparuthi et al 9 investigated the uplift behavior of circular anchors in loose, medium-dense and dense dry sand, the difference in the uplift behaviors of shallow and deep buried anchors was observed, and the anchor diameter, embedment ratio, and sand density significantly influenced the uplift capacity. Giampa et al 10 analyzed the effect of anchor shapes (circular, square, triangular, and kite) on the uplift behavior of shallow horizontal anchor plates through 1G physical model tests, and the results indicated that the circular anchor had the highest pullout capacity, whereas the square anchor had the lowest. Moreover, the uplift bearing characteristics of rectangular anchors in the ocean were investigated by Liu et al 11 through small-scale model tests, the effect of hydrates on the uplift capacity was evaluated, and the results indicated that hydrate dissociation adversely affected the pullout capacity of the anchors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…investigated the uplift behavior of circular anchors in loose, medium‐dense and dense dry sand, the difference in the uplift behaviors of shallow and deep buried anchors was observed, and the anchor diameter, embedment ratio, and sand density significantly influenced the uplift capacity. Giampa et al 10 . analyzed the effect of anchor shapes (circular, square, triangular, and kite) on the uplift behavior of shallow horizontal anchor plates through 1G physical model tests, and the results indicated that the circular anchor had the highest pullout capacity, whereas the square anchor had the lowest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%