2012
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.21743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of kerosene–water two‐phase flow in a vertical pipe using hot‐film and dual optical probes

Abstract: Bradford Scholars -how to deposit your paper Overview Copyright check• Check if your publisher allows submission to a repository.• Use the Sherpa RoMEO database if you are not sure about your publisher's position or email openaccess@bradford.ac.uk.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon was observed by Ref. [ 26 ], who examined water–kerosene mixtures in a pipe over a wide range of kerosene-water compositions (zero to 50% kerosene) and flows (laminar to turbulent). Flows changes in this study barely exceed laminar flow (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This phenomenon was observed by Ref. [ 26 ], who examined water–kerosene mixtures in a pipe over a wide range of kerosene-water compositions (zero to 50% kerosene) and flows (laminar to turbulent). Flows changes in this study barely exceed laminar flow (see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…19 ). Compared to the work of [ 26 ], this range would be too small to see a significant effect. The oil fraction change is much more comparable with that of [ 26 ], and the increase in the range of drop sizes is consistent with their work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results demonstrate that the distribution is axisymmetric with the centreline peak value of 0.45 m/s compared to a water peak value of 0.35 m/s (Figure a). When the volumetric quality is increased to 18.6%, the drop velocity distribution becomes flatter as shown in Figure b …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%