2016 IEEE 17th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/spawc.2016.7536853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study of indoor tracking using UWB measurements and particle filtering

Abstract: Abstract-Target tracking with ultra-wideband (UWB) signals in indoor environments is a challenging problem due to the presence of multipath and non-line-of-sight conditions (NLOS). A solution to this problem is to use particle filtering (PF), which is able to handle both nonlinear models and non-Gaussian uncertainties that typically appear in the presence of NLOS. In this paper, we compare four different PF variants, that differ in terms of how NLOS measurements are handled. According to our experimental resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various methods have been proposed for TOA-based positioning using particle filters. Savic and Larsson (2016) proposed an improved particle-filter-based positioning algorithm with a Gaussian process regression (GPR) based machine-learning method for correcting delayed range measurements. The positioning accuracy of the algorithm is highly dependent on the environment of the collected training data, and thus it has poor robustness to changes in a given positioning environment.…”
Section: Toa-based Positioning Using Particle Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various methods have been proposed for TOA-based positioning using particle filters. Savic and Larsson (2016) proposed an improved particle-filter-based positioning algorithm with a Gaussian process regression (GPR) based machine-learning method for correcting delayed range measurements. The positioning accuracy of the algorithm is highly dependent on the environment of the collected training data, and thus it has poor robustness to changes in a given positioning environment.…”
Section: Toa-based Positioning Using Particle Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A simple and straightforward way to do this is to remove the identified delayed measurements and evaluate the predicted particles using the remaining identified direct range measurements. However, Savic and Larsson (2016) point out that the particle filter using the range measurements with the rejection of identified delayed measurements may still suffer from serious accuracy degeneration due to the accumulation of positioning error over time.…”
Section: Step 4: Posterior Position Estimation and Updatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…One best Bayesian filtering based candidate to manage measurement uncertainty is Particle Filtering (PF). It is able to manage non-Gaussian uncertainties that typically appear in the presence of NLOS conditions [35,36], it is used for solving localization, tracking, and navigation problems [37]. PF is a Monte Carlo estimation algorithm in which a posteriori probability density function is constructed by using weighted particles to make it suitable for the state estimation of non-Gaussian systems [38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%