2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/1292513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study of Friction Resistance between Steel and Concrete in Prefabricated Composite Beam with High‐Strength Frictional Bolt

Abstract: Prefabrication of composites beam reduces the construction time and makes them easily to be assembled, deconstructed, and partially repaired. e use of high-strength frictional bolt shear connectors can greatly enhance the sustainability of infrastructure. However, researches about the concrete-steel friction behavior are very limited. To provide a contribution to this area, 21 tests were conducted to measure the friction coefficient and slip stiffness with different concrete strength, steel strength, and surfa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Material properties of UHPC and steel rebar used in defining the CDP model are illustrated in Table 1. The contact between supporting and loading steel plates and the concrete was surface to surface of two types of behavior; tangential contact with penalty friction formulation having 0.5 friction coefficient [14,28], besides normal behavior with hard contact to prevent the penetration between the adjacent surfaces. The steel plates were constrained as a rigid body.…”
Section: Calibration Of Cdp Model Parameters For the Practical Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material properties of UHPC and steel rebar used in defining the CDP model are illustrated in Table 1. The contact between supporting and loading steel plates and the concrete was surface to surface of two types of behavior; tangential contact with penalty friction formulation having 0.5 friction coefficient [14,28], besides normal behavior with hard contact to prevent the penetration between the adjacent surfaces. The steel plates were constrained as a rigid body.…”
Section: Calibration Of Cdp Model Parameters For the Practical Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between the steel bolsters and concrete column is selected to be a contact with the normal behavior of hard contact type to prevent penetration between them and allow separation after contact, and tangential behavior with a friction coefficient of 0.45 between concrete and steel. The friction coefficient between concrete and steel ranges between 0.29 to 0.6, as stated by Guo et al [40], Rinker et al [41], and Zhao and Zhu [42]. Friction coefficient sensitivity was checked by the software and chosen to be 0.45 throughout the numerical analysis due to the compressive stress considering the effect of a compressed rubber pad between concrete and steel.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Of Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize the frictional behavior, a friction coefficient of 0.52 was assigned to the interfaces between steel and concrete. This value was determined based on the average obtained from the interface friction values reported by Rabbat et al [23] and Guo et al [24]. In addition, a friction coefficient of 0.25 was applied to all steel interfaces.…”
Section: Interaction Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%