The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2008
DOI: 10.1080/13287982.2008.11464992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study of Dynamic Material Properties of Clay Brick and Mortar at Different Strain Rates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
81
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
9
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A useful and practical way to numerically represent the material properties change is to define dynamic increase factors (DIFs). The use of DIF laws is found suitable to study masonry structures subjected to fast loads application [24,25]. In this way, a homogenized model that may account the latter is relevant.…”
Section: Strain-rate Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A useful and practical way to numerically represent the material properties change is to define dynamic increase factors (DIFs). The use of DIF laws is found suitable to study masonry structures subjected to fast loads application [24,25]. In this way, a homogenized model that may account the latter is relevant.…”
Section: Strain-rate Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research proves that the use of static strength properties can lead to unreliable results for the masonry behaviour under fast dynamic actions, see [13,24]. Static strength material properties may exhibit an enhancement according to the strain rate level of the applied load.…”
Section: Strain-rate Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is also necessary to compare to other materials which are perhaps simpler in constitution, as there is a lack of data on comparable adobe type materials in the literature at the pressures of interest. There is a reasonable amount of data taken at lower strain rates [3,4,5,6], however this is not directly comparable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%