Clean Coal Technology and Sustainable Development 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-2023-0_23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study of Coal MILD Combustion at a Pilot-Scale Furnace

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Energy Yield (%) = HHV of torrefied biomass HHV of raw biomass × % Mass Yield (6) Energy Efficiency = Energy yield Mass yield = HHV of torrefied biomass HHV of raw biomass (7) where HHV is the high heating value of the sample 2.3.6. Proximate Analysis…”
Section: Production Yield Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Energy Yield (%) = HHV of torrefied biomass HHV of raw biomass × % Mass Yield (6) Energy Efficiency = Energy yield Mass yield = HHV of torrefied biomass HHV of raw biomass (7) where HHV is the high heating value of the sample 2.3.6. Proximate Analysis…”
Section: Production Yield Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a study, emissions from coal combustion may decrease human lifespans by an average of 11 years [7]. These poisons include mercury, lead, cadmium, sulfur, and nitrate compounds which can impair brain function and pass through the nasal mucosa and into the lungs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is considered as validated, industrialized, clean, efficient, and one of the most prospective coal technology. The United States Department of Energy surveys and forecasts the development of IGCC power generation technology, and related research result is shown in Table III [3]. …”
Section: A Igcc Power Generation Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coal combustion experiments conducted in a 0.58 MW test furnace showed that the NO x emission from highly preheated air combustion was 215−220 ppm, much lower than the NO x emission of 800− 1000 ppm for conventional combustion. 11 The experiments conducted by Stadler et al 12,13 and Mao et al 14,15 showed that the NO emission of MILD combustion realized by increasing jet velocity to induce strong internal FGR was half that of swirl-flame combustion. The experimental and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical results of Saha et al 16−19 suggested that smaller particle sizes and higher jet velocities lead to lower NO x emission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%