2019
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)be.1943-5592.0001348
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study of Across-Wind Aerodynamic Behavior of a Bridge Tower

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent decades, numerous studies have been conducted focusing on the VIV performance of long-span bridges (Bearman and Owen, 1998; Ehsan and Scanlan, 1990; Griffin and Hall, 1991; Liu et al, 2018; Matsumoto, 1999; Yang et al, 2016). Studies of VIV suppression and control for various bridges follow and a number of meaningful conclusions are summarized (Camarri and Iollo, 2010; Chen et al, 2014; Du and Sun, 2015; Fujino and Yoshida, 2002; Ma et al, 2018; Wu and Kareem, 2013). Common VIV countermeasures include both aerodynamic and mechanical countermeasures (Chen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, numerous studies have been conducted focusing on the VIV performance of long-span bridges (Bearman and Owen, 1998; Ehsan and Scanlan, 1990; Griffin and Hall, 1991; Liu et al, 2018; Matsumoto, 1999; Yang et al, 2016). Studies of VIV suppression and control for various bridges follow and a number of meaningful conclusions are summarized (Camarri and Iollo, 2010; Chen et al, 2014; Du and Sun, 2015; Fujino and Yoshida, 2002; Ma et al, 2018; Wu and Kareem, 2013). Common VIV countermeasures include both aerodynamic and mechanical countermeasures (Chen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boundary layer inflow conditions were produced using spires and rough elements regularly arranged in the upstream, as illustrated in Figure 4. The wind tunnel test chamber has a rectangular section with a height of 4.5 m and width of 22.5 m, which is ideal for large model tests (Ma et al, 2019a). Four large fans are installed at the front of the test chamber, each with a maximum power of 160 kW.…”
Section: Xnjd-3 Wind Tunnelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fang et al (2019) compared different copula models and selected the optimal model to simulate the correlation of wind and wave parameters, and studied the extreme response of a sea-crossing bridge tower under correlated wind and waves. Ma et al (2019) conducted a wind tunnel test on a free-standing single-column pylon with a chamfered square cross section by using the segmental model and the full-bridge aeroelastic model. Fang et al (2020) studied the vibration of a four-column high bridge tower by wind tunnel tests and numerical simulations and pointed out that the displacement of the tower top increased with the increase of wind speed, and different cross sections of the tower showed different vortex shedding phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%