2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2015.01.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study for hybrid humidification–dehumidification water desalination and air conditioning system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Table , the COP of the current system has no big difference with those of the comparable systems; in addition, the water productivity of the current system is much higher than that presented by Nada et al and Fouda et al and has approximately similar value with Nada et al and less than the system of Elattar et al This can be attributed to that the systems proposed by Nada et al are differed in operating conditions and the systems' COPs are calculated based on the refrigeration capacity ( Q • ref ) rather than room cooling load ( Q • R ). In addition, the current system COP is closer to those of Fouda et al and Elattar et al; this is due to the difference in operating conditions of the comparable systems (RSHF = 0.9) and current system (RSHF = 0.6); moreover, the nature of the current deep cooling system consumes more energy for operation and in turn leads to lower COP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As shown in Table , the COP of the current system has no big difference with those of the comparable systems; in addition, the water productivity of the current system is much higher than that presented by Nada et al and Fouda et al and has approximately similar value with Nada et al and less than the system of Elattar et al This can be attributed to that the systems proposed by Nada et al are differed in operating conditions and the systems' COPs are calculated based on the refrigeration capacity ( Q • ref ) rather than room cooling load ( Q • R ). In addition, the current system COP is closer to those of Fouda et al and Elattar et al; this is due to the difference in operating conditions of the comparable systems (RSHF = 0.9) and current system (RSHF = 0.6); moreover, the nature of the current deep cooling system consumes more energy for operation and in turn leads to lower COP.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This may be attributed to the increase of the sensible and latent heat of the air mixture (state M in Figure 2A,B) at the entrance of the cooling coil which leads to the increase of the required cooling coil capacity and the electric power consumptions of the refrigeration unit to attain the required supply air temperature to the conditioned room (see Eqs. (2), (6), (14), and (15)). It was observed that the COP of the proposed system enhances by 92% and 44% compared with that of the basic system at FAR of 0.2 and 1, respectively.…”
Section: Effect Of the Room-sensible Heat Factor On The System Perfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…H. Kang et al [28] studied the performance of two stage multi-effect desalination system based on humidification-dehumidification process. Nada et al [29] studied hybrid humidification-dehumidification desalination and air-conditioning system and demonstrated that increasing air mass flow rate and humidity increases refrigeration capacity and fresh water production rate. Solar still desalination technology has several merits such as simple structure, easy maintenance and installation and a few moving components but low still efficiency are one of the major concerns which need further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%