2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental study and parameter analysis on the seismic performance of self-centering hybrid reinforced concrete shear walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental works were validated using analytical modeling. Besides that, several researchers (Holden et al 2003;Preti and Giuriani 2012;Smith et al 2011Smith et al , 2013Gavridou et al 2014;Pakiding et al, 2015;Zhu and Guo 2017;Lu and Wu 2017;Gu et al 2019) made some comparison of seismic performance between the conventional precast wall (emulative) and precast hybrid wall system (non-emulative) in term of hysteresis loops, energy dissipation, lateral strength, initial construction cost, economic losses and others. In common, the results show that the precast hybrid walls feature minimal structural damage, superior restoring, energy dissipation, ductile behavior and excellent self-centering tendency over larger lateral displacements compared to their reinforced concrete (RC) counterpart.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental works were validated using analytical modeling. Besides that, several researchers (Holden et al 2003;Preti and Giuriani 2012;Smith et al 2011Smith et al , 2013Gavridou et al 2014;Pakiding et al, 2015;Zhu and Guo 2017;Lu and Wu 2017;Gu et al 2019) made some comparison of seismic performance between the conventional precast wall (emulative) and precast hybrid wall system (non-emulative) in term of hysteresis loops, energy dissipation, lateral strength, initial construction cost, economic losses and others. In common, the results show that the precast hybrid walls feature minimal structural damage, superior restoring, energy dissipation, ductile behavior and excellent self-centering tendency over larger lateral displacements compared to their reinforced concrete (RC) counterpart.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the mass of the cantilever beam is relatively light and the moment of inertia is small in transverse vibration, the resulting shear deformation is negligible. Therefore, the influence of shear deformation and moment of inertia on the beam can be ignored, only its bending deformation can be considered, and the Euler-Berner beam mechanical analysis model mentioned above can be established (Xu and Lu 2011;Gu et al 2018). Combined with the condition of cantilever beam which one is the fixed and another is free.…”
Section: The Theoretical Model Of the Free Vibration Of Cantilever Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To examine the cyclic and dynamic behavior of the hybrid wall system, several experimental studies have been conducted. [ 13–16 ] Also, several shake table tests have been carried out on the precast concrete buildings with hybrid wall system. [ 17,18 ] The results show that the hybrid wall system has an ideal flag‐shaped hysteretic behavior, representing superior self‐centering ability and enough energy dissipation capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%