Experimental study and modeling of the reaction H + O2 + M→ HO2 + M (M = Ar, N2, H2O) at elevated pressures and temperatures between 1050 and 1250 K

A simple reactive gasdynamic model for the computation of gas temperature and species concentrations behind reflected shock waves

“…Figure 4 shows the measured temperature and H 2 O concentration (solid curves) during a shock with 1.0% H 2 and 0.625% O 2 in Ar (φ = 0.8) as the initial mixture. The measured results are compared with simulations using (1) the hydrogen mechanism developed by Conaire et al [21]; and (2) the modified GRI-Mech 3.0 [22] with the measured reaction rate for H + O 2 + M → HO 2 + M by Bates et al [23]. This reaction rate is also recommended by Baulch et al [24], and is in good agreement with the data of Michael et al [25].…”

An updated comprehensive kinetic model of hydrogen combustion

“…As can be seen, the result of Michael et al [19] is in very good agreement with that of [18]. Figure 4 shows the temperature and pressure dependence of the rate constant of (R2) predicted by the present mechanism and by Troe [17].…”

“…The present mechanism is compared against a wide range of experimental Pirraglia et al [24] Hessler [16] Masten et al [25] Yu et al [28] Michael et al [19] Mueller et al [1] Ashman et al [20] Bates et al [18] Baulch et al [34] Getzinger [38] Zellner et al [36] Oldenberg et al [39] Present…”

Chemical‐kinetic modeling of ignition delay: Considerations in interpreting shock tube data

“…For consistency the present SENKIN chemical-kinetic calculations shown in Fig. 2 were performed using GRI-Mech 3.0 [38] and implementing the same updates for the heat of formation of OH [39] and the reaction H + O 2 + M = HO 2 + M [40] as those used by Pang et al [30]. For ignition times less than approximately 1 ms, the SENKIN constant U , V model agrees fairly well with the data.…”