2015
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2014.2386346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Study and Analysis of Hydrostatic Pressure Sensitivity of Polymer Fibre Bragg Gratings

Abstract: The intrinsic hydrostatic pressure sensitivity of polymer optical fibre Bragg grating (POFBG) with different diameters are investigated. POFBGs are inscribed in singlemode polymer fibre and etched down to different diameters. We have experimentally demonstrated that the material properties of the polymer optical fibre can change after etching and thus the etching procedure can have an impact on the pressure sensitivity of the POFBG. It is observed from the experimental results that hydrostatic pressure induce … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
32
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As Young's modulus of the polymer fibe (∼2.9 GPa) is much lower than that of silica fibe (∼70 GPa), the pressure sensitivity of sensors based on POF could be comparatively higher than that of silica fibe [55]. It should be noted that, in the case of a silica FBG, the hydrostatic pressure induced grating period change (strain effect) dominates the change in refractive index and as a result a negative sensitivity is observed [55], [56]. While for a POFBG, the dominant effect is the refractive index change than the grating period change and as a result the sensitivity becomes positive as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Sensing Characterization Of a Ps-pofbgmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Young's modulus of the polymer fibe (∼2.9 GPa) is much lower than that of silica fibe (∼70 GPa), the pressure sensitivity of sensors based on POF could be comparatively higher than that of silica fibe [55]. It should be noted that, in the case of a silica FBG, the hydrostatic pressure induced grating period change (strain effect) dominates the change in refractive index and as a result a negative sensitivity is observed [55], [56]. While for a POFBG, the dominant effect is the refractive index change than the grating period change and as a result the sensitivity becomes positive as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Sensing Characterization Of a Ps-pofbgmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…4(c) we observe that there is a linear shift of the center wavelengths of the two dips with increasing/decreasing pressure, with a sensitivity of 0.46 ± 0.03 pm/kPa, which is 2 times more sensitive than a uniform POFBG [54]. As Young's modulus of the polymer fibe (∼2.9 GPa) is much lower than that of silica fibe (∼70 GPa), the pressure sensitivity of sensors based on POF could be comparatively higher than that of silica fibe [55]. It should be noted that, in the case of a silica FBG, the hydrostatic pressure induced grating period change (strain effect) dominates the change in refractive index and as a result a negative sensitivity is observed [55], [56].…”
Section: Sensing Characterization Of a Ps-pofbgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research includes POFBGs for strain 1,2 , temperature 3,4 and humidity 5,6 sensing, but also investigations towards measuring hydrostatic pressure have been carried out [7][8][9] . These investigations show that, contrary to FBGs in silica fibers, the pressure response in POFBGs is positive, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its unique properties, PMMA has become one of the most common polymers used for the fabrication of gratings and waveguides. PMMA-based optical fiber Bragg gratings (POFBGs) were found to be sensitive to relative humidity, temperature, strain and pressure with high sensitivity [8][9][10][11]. The sensing response time of POFBGs can be significantly improved either by reducing the fiber diameter with chemical etching [9] or by spatial modification of fiber geometry using laser micromachining [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%