2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental studies on the effect of different metallic substrates on marine biofouling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation on the predominance of Lepas anatifera corroborates the earlier observation made on the instrumented moored buoy sensors operated in the Northern India Ocean (Venkatesan et al, 2017). This variation in the fouling species between the earlier studies on coastal environment ( Sathpathy et al, 2010;Vedaprakash et al, 2013) could be attributed to the availability of larvae of the settling species in the local ecosystem, presence of required food, variation in the sunlight penetration over the depth, and so forth, which play a limiting factor for recruitment of many biofouling organisms. The most dominant fouling species on the buoy hull deployed in the open ocean is gooseneck barnacle of Lepas sp.…”
Section: Biofouling Observations On Sensorssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This observation on the predominance of Lepas anatifera corroborates the earlier observation made on the instrumented moored buoy sensors operated in the Northern India Ocean (Venkatesan et al, 2017). This variation in the fouling species between the earlier studies on coastal environment ( Sathpathy et al, 2010;Vedaprakash et al, 2013) could be attributed to the availability of larvae of the settling species in the local ecosystem, presence of required food, variation in the sunlight penetration over the depth, and so forth, which play a limiting factor for recruitment of many biofouling organisms. The most dominant fouling species on the buoy hull deployed in the open ocean is gooseneck barnacle of Lepas sp.…”
Section: Biofouling Observations On Sensorssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Moored marine sensors were retrieved for observation and maintenance after a period of 1 year. The sensors of all the locations and depths of deployment were observed for biofouling, and data on biofouling area coverage (% area coverage) and biofouling load (kg/sensor) were recorded, according to Vedaprakash et al (2013) and Venkatesan et al (2017). For calculating biofouling load, weight accumulated on the sensors as a result of fouling was estimated by subtracting the initial weight of the sensors from the final wet weight of sensors along with fouled organisms.…”
Section: Biofouling Observations and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to these negative impacts, industries protect man-made structures either by using preventative measures or by removing fouling organisms, methods that can be harmful to the environment. For example, the use of antifouling paints to prevent recruitment of fouling organisms raises ecotoxicological concerns, as copper is one of the most popular antifouling components (Turner, 2010;Miller et al, 2020). Comprehensive understanding of how fouling communities evolve is an essential step toward developing more effective, safe, and sustainable approaches to mitigating biofouling of artificial substrates.…”
Section: Marine Biofoulingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, organic metabolites, such as acetic acid and fatty acids, can dissolve the protective calcareous deposits, which increase the polarizing current density and alter the Ca/Mg ratio [31]. The organisms' fouling marine structures are affected by several factors, including location, hydrology, season, and the properties of the substrate [32,33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%