1936
DOI: 10.1037/h0055902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental studies of changes in attitude. II. A study of the effect of printed argument on changes in attitude.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that if a persuasive message does affect attitudes, it is likely that its effect may be dissipated as audience size increases. This replicates early experiments by Knower (1935Knower ( , 1936 and tends to support social impact theory.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These results suggest that if a persuasive message does affect attitudes, it is likely that its effect may be dissipated as audience size increases. This replicates early experiments by Knower (1935Knower ( , 1936 and tends to support social impact theory.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Several subsequent surveys came to the conclusion that television is generally perceived as more credible than media with decreased sensory information such as radio or newspapers (Berg & Kiefer, 1996;Gaziano & McGrath, 1986;Ibelema & Powell, 2001;Roper Organization, 1991). These results are in line with older studies stating that audiovisual presentations lead to more attitude change than sole visual and print presentations (Cantril & Allport, 1935;Haugh, 1952;Knower, 1935Knower, , 1936Wilke, 1934). However, why this effect occurs isn't quite clear yet.…”
Section: Media Credibility and Modalitysupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The study of message order effects has been a mainstay of persuasion research since the inception of the discipline (e.g., Knower, 1936). A significant amount of time and attention has been spent trying to better understand what Lund (1925) first identified as the dominance of the first persuasive message when two competing messages are provided to an individual one immediately after the other (e.g., Hovland, 1951;Hovland & Mandel, 1957).…”
Section: The Primacy Effectmentioning
confidence: 98%