Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781118648551.ch20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental studies and practical challenges in fluvial geomorphology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 88 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique involves projecting a fringe pattern onto the experiment and analysing its deformation by the topography. The approach has been applied in experimental models of structural geology (Santolaria et al., 2015; Soto et al., 2020), submarine gravity currents (Weill et al., 2014), Martian valley formation (Marra et al., 2014), braided channels (Leduc et al., 2014; Métivier et al., 2016; Reitz et al., 2014) and alluvial and debris‐flow fans (de Haas et al., 2015, 2016; Delorme et al., 2018). As with TLS methods, depths are underestimated (channel bed elevations are overestimated) due to refraction of light at the air–water interface, so a refraction correction must be applied.…”
Section: Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique involves projecting a fringe pattern onto the experiment and analysing its deformation by the topography. The approach has been applied in experimental models of structural geology (Santolaria et al., 2015; Soto et al., 2020), submarine gravity currents (Weill et al., 2014), Martian valley formation (Marra et al., 2014), braided channels (Leduc et al., 2014; Métivier et al., 2016; Reitz et al., 2014) and alluvial and debris‐flow fans (de Haas et al., 2015, 2016; Delorme et al., 2018). As with TLS methods, depths are underestimated (channel bed elevations are overestimated) due to refraction of light at the air–water interface, so a refraction correction must be applied.…”
Section: Topographymentioning
confidence: 99%