2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2107.07876
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Snapshot Verification of non-Markovianity with Unknown System-Probe Coupling

Henri Lyyra,
Olli Siltanen,
Jyrki Piilo
et al.

Abstract: We apply the recently proposed quantum probing protocols with an unknown system-probe coupling to probe the convex coefficients in mixtures of commuting states. By using two reference states instead of one as originally suggested, we are able to probe both lower and upper bounds for the convex coefficient. We perform extensive analysis for the roles of the parameters characterizing the double peaked Gaussian frequency spectrum in the Markovian-to-non-Markovian transition of the polarization dynamics of a singl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These correlations are the basis for notions of classical objectivity [3][4][5][6][7] and are also known to play a key role in the characterisation of the dynamics, in particular, if the system undergoes a Markovian (memoryless) or non-Markovian evolution [8,9]. Both notions of classical objectivity and non-Markovian evolution have been the object of experimental investigations, see for example [10][11][12][13] and [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These correlations are the basis for notions of classical objectivity [3][4][5][6][7] and are also known to play a key role in the characterisation of the dynamics, in particular, if the system undergoes a Markovian (memoryless) or non-Markovian evolution [8,9]. Both notions of classical objectivity and non-Markovian evolution have been the object of experimental investigations, see for example [10][11][12][13] and [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%