2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Seismic Performance of Beam-Column Subassemblies Using Ductile Embeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It beam and column joint details adopted on floors two through five exhibited stable ductile 141 performance in previous component test programs (Warcholik and Priestley 1998a, b, Chang 142 et al 2008, Chang et al 2013) and have since been used in practice. It beam and column joint details adopted on floors two through five exhibited stable ductile 141 performance in previous component test programs (Warcholik and Priestley 1998a, b, Chang 142 et al 2008, Chang et al 2013) and have since been used in practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It beam and column joint details adopted on floors two through five exhibited stable ductile 141 performance in previous component test programs (Warcholik and Priestley 1998a, b, Chang 142 et al 2008, Chang et al 2013) and have since been used in practice. It beam and column joint details adopted on floors two through five exhibited stable ductile 141 performance in previous component test programs (Warcholik and Priestley 1998a, b, Chang 142 et al 2008, Chang et al 2013) and have since been used in practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Finally, a nonlinear elastic material is used to model the posttensioned strands in the upturn beams. The numerical models of the various frame beam systems were evaluated against prior experiments on similar subassemblies (Chang et al, 2008).…”
Section: Numerical Modeling Of the Test Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two tests have been reported in the literature, and the tests exhibited satisfactory hysteretic performance and drift capacity. Chang et al (2008) report the test results of two interior beam-column specimens whose beams incorporated ASTM A722 and A1035 beam longitudinal reinforcement. These test specimens are referred to as Specimen 3 and Specimen 4.…”
Section: Alternative Mechanisms For Developing Beam Longitudinal Reinmentioning
confidence: 99%