2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental seismic behaviour of bottom-through-diaphragm and top-ring connection to SST columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al [5] conducted static performance tests and finite element analysis on six CFST columns as well as steel beam joints featuring reinforced diaphragms, which showed that the stiffness of joints with partial stiffening diaphragms equaled 89% as that of joints with full stiffening diaphragms. Cao et al [6] indicated that the five-layer through-bottom reinforcing rings and top-ring-to-column connection had good ductility and excellent dissipative properties in cyclic tests. The experimental research and finite element analysis conducted by Zhang et al [7] investigated four types of joints in circular CFST column steel beams with outer diaphragms, revealing that the failure mode significantly influences the stress distribution characteristics within the joint area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [5] conducted static performance tests and finite element analysis on six CFST columns as well as steel beam joints featuring reinforced diaphragms, which showed that the stiffness of joints with partial stiffening diaphragms equaled 89% as that of joints with full stiffening diaphragms. Cao et al [6] indicated that the five-layer through-bottom reinforcing rings and top-ring-to-column connection had good ductility and excellent dissipative properties in cyclic tests. The experimental research and finite element analysis conducted by Zhang et al [7] investigated four types of joints in circular CFST column steel beams with outer diaphragms, revealing that the failure mode significantly influences the stress distribution characteristics within the joint area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the main forms of beam-column joints, the joints with external diaphragms have the advantages of clear force transmission, good plasticity, high bearing capacity, and strong energy dissipation capacity [5][6][7][8]. Because of its own structural characteristics, this joint enables the plastic hinge to occur first in the beam section, allowing the beam to dissipate energy during the seismic event and thus ensure the column does not lose its load-bearing capacity [9,10]. However, due to a large amount of on-site construction work and high requirements for weld quality, the external diaphragm joints are rarely used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of diaphragm plays a critical role in the force transfer and distribution of bending moment from beam to column components. Extensive experimental studies have been carried out on connections with external diaphragms (Yoshizato et al 1994;Park et al 2005;Li et al 2010;Vulcu et al 2017;andRong et al 2019), internal diaphragms (Cheng andChung 2003;Chou and Jao 2010;and Kang et al 2015), and through diaphragms Cao et al 2018;and Yu et al 2019). Nonetheless, most of the aforementioned studies are only focused on the performance of plane connections and ignore the interaction of bi-directional forces at beam ends that do exist in actual buildings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%