2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental scale multi component absorption of SO2 and NO by NH3/NaClO scrubbing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The vibrational band at 617 cm -1 was assigned to the presence of S-O stretching on the surface of the adsorbent. The slight vibration band at 1369 cm -1 was attributed to a C=N group because of the presence of nitrate (NO 3 -) species [18][19][20]. The presence of carboxyl groups (C-O) on the active sites was indicated by the appearance of strong vibrational bands at 941 and 765 cm -1 .…”
Section: Characterization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vibrational band at 617 cm -1 was assigned to the presence of S-O stretching on the surface of the adsorbent. The slight vibration band at 1369 cm -1 was attributed to a C=N group because of the presence of nitrate (NO 3 -) species [18][19][20]. The presence of carboxyl groups (C-O) on the active sites was indicated by the appearance of strong vibrational bands at 941 and 765 cm -1 .…”
Section: Characterization Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 So far, many methods for controlling NO x contamination, including SCR (selective catalytic reduction) in the gas phase, absorption in the liquid phase and adsorption in the solid phase, have been developed and applied in industries. [9][10][11] However, the leakage of NH 3 causes air pollution in SCR methods and produces a large amount of wastewater and results in an increase in cost in absorption methods. Comparing the two above-mentioned methods, adsorption is better for the removal of NO x owing to its excellent characteristics of larger surface area, better selectivity, higher adsorption capacity and rate, better regeneration, and chemical stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike SO 2 , the insoluble gas NO is difficult to remove using a wet scrubbing method. To date, many chemical reagents such as H 2 O 2 , KMnO 4 , NaClO 2 , NaClO, Na 2 S 2 O 8 , Fe(II)EDTA, and Co(NH 3 ) 6 2+ have been investigated to convert insoluble NO into soluble NO x , which can be subsequently removed by wet scrubbing . The use of an H 2 O 2 solution has been widely investigated by scholars due to the advantages of low cost and environmental friendliness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%