2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental response of URM single leaf and cavity walls in out-of-plane two-way bending generated by seismic excitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• the rocking problem is formulated in a fashion very similar to the one of a classic elastic oscillator (EO), more familiar to engineers, while accounting for the major differences between the two systems highlighted in Makris and Konstantinidis 17 ; • its implementation in already available finite-element environments is straightforward and will simplify a comparison with static-equivalent code procedures; • modelling both the pre-cracking (ie, before full development of mechanism) and the post-cracking response of walls responding in one-way 33 or two-way bending [34][35][36] is possible. During post-cracking behaviour, the overall dissipated energy is given primarily by impacts and secondary by some hysteretic dissipation, both accounted for by the proposed EVD models; • accounting for additional sources of viscous energy dissipation, such as related to the response of attached horizontal structures, is streamlined 37 ; • a reduced computational effort is necessary, allowing to perform large numbers of nonlinear time-history analyses, such as those necessary to assess the risk for economic and human losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• the rocking problem is formulated in a fashion very similar to the one of a classic elastic oscillator (EO), more familiar to engineers, while accounting for the major differences between the two systems highlighted in Makris and Konstantinidis 17 ; • its implementation in already available finite-element environments is straightforward and will simplify a comparison with static-equivalent code procedures; • modelling both the pre-cracking (ie, before full development of mechanism) and the post-cracking response of walls responding in one-way 33 or two-way bending [34][35][36] is possible. During post-cracking behaviour, the overall dissipated energy is given primarily by impacts and secondary by some hysteretic dissipation, both accounted for by the proposed EVD models; • accounting for additional sources of viscous energy dissipation, such as related to the response of attached horizontal structures, is streamlined 37 ; • a reduced computational effort is necessary, allowing to perform large numbers of nonlinear time-history analyses, such as those necessary to assess the risk for economic and human losses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 . Characteristics of the employed input motions and their sequence along with the employed scaling factors are summarised in Table 4 of the reference article [1] .…”
Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each specimen was densely instrumented with various sensors measuring accelerations and displacements throughout the testing sequence. The locations of these sensors and their operating status throughout the testing sequence ( Table 4 of reference article [1] ) is provided in Table 1 , Table 2 , Table 3 , Table 4 , Table 5 and Fig. 2 , Fig.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this framework, a comprehensive experimental campaign has been carried out since 2014 in a few European laboratories, including the Macrolab/Stevinlaboratory at Delft University of Technology (TU Delft), with a large part of this research focusing on CS brick masonry . The dynamic behaviour was studied at the laboratories of Eucentre in Italy and LNEC in Portugal, with experimental tests on single leaf and cavity walls under in-plane (Graziotti et al 2016a) and out-ofplane (Graziotti et al 2016b(Graziotti et al , 2019 loading, as well as on full-scale structures (Graziotti et al 2017;. The investigation at TU Delft considered quasi-static cyclic loading and was characterised by a multiscale approach, with tests at material (Jafari et al 2017(Jafari et al , 2018, connection (Skroumpelou et al 2018), component (Messali et al 2017;Damiola et al 2018), and structural (Esposito et al , 2019 level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%