2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2015.10.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental response of cold-formed steel Zee-section beam-columns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been observed [18,19] that the current AISI-S100-16 beam-column design approach can be overly conservative because the stability of the member under the actual stress distribution that arises due to the combined axial loading and bending is not directly considered; instead, as discussed above, a linear interaction between the purely axial and purely bending resistance end points is assumed. This effect has been investigated experimentally [20,21,22] and numerically [18,23], with a new extension to the DSM being recently proposed to account for potential strength increases if the actual stress distribution is considered [19,24,25].…”
Section: Design Of Cold-formed Steel Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been observed [18,19] that the current AISI-S100-16 beam-column design approach can be overly conservative because the stability of the member under the actual stress distribution that arises due to the combined axial loading and bending is not directly considered; instead, as discussed above, a linear interaction between the purely axial and purely bending resistance end points is assumed. This effect has been investigated experimentally [20,21,22] and numerically [18,23], with a new extension to the DSM being recently proposed to account for potential strength increases if the actual stress distribution is considered [19,24,25].…”
Section: Design Of Cold-formed Steel Beammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where the expressions for P net and M net,x are listed in Table 2 and the factored axial and bending cross-section resistances are determined using the DSM, as outlined below. This approach is similar to that followed in previous experimental and numerical works on coldformed steel beam-columns [28,35,36].…”
Section: Stage Imentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The developed method was extended to axial + biaxial bending. A significant effort in the research was directed at developing appropriate methods to combine the different strength formulas into a compatible expression for any combined action; testing [45,46] as well as shell FEM simulations [47] were used to verify the developed design strength expressions [43,48]. Examples of the final result of the newly developed beam-column strength surfaces are provided in Fig.…”
Section: Design Under Multiple Actionsmentioning
confidence: 99%