2017
DOI: 10.24874/ti.2017.39.03.13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Research on the Determination of the Coefficient of Sliding Wear under Iron Ore Handling Conditions

Abstract: A B S T R A C T

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the average wear depth and wear width, the numerical results show 36% and 34% discrepancy, respectively. The difference can be explained by four factors [ 31 ]: wear volume calculation in model and experiment, wear mechanism and number of samples from experiments and wear of particle tip in the experiment. First, the calculation of the wear volume is different.…”
Section: Verification Of Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the average wear depth and wear width, the numerical results show 36% and 34% discrepancy, respectively. The difference can be explained by four factors [ 31 ]: wear volume calculation in model and experiment, wear mechanism and number of samples from experiments and wear of particle tip in the experiment. First, the calculation of the wear volume is different.…”
Section: Verification Of Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Wear contour extraction. ( a ) An iron ore with a spherical head; ( b ) measuring of the cross-section [ 31 ] and ( c ) three wear contours based on the measurement after test. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where, H is the surface hardness of the contact material, and K=10 -11 according to the experimental data of Chen (Chen et al 2017). Wall wear thickness h can be calculated by:…”
Section: Discrete Phase Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%