2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2008.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental reconsideration of the utility of serum starvation as a method for synchronizing mammalian cells

Abstract: Accurate cell-size determinations support the prediction that serum starvation and related whole-culture methods cannot synchronize cells. Theoretical considerations predict that whole-culture methods of synchronization cannot synchronize cells. Upon serum starvation, the fraction of cells with a G1-phase amount of DNA increased, but the cell-size distribution is not narrowed. In true synchronization, the cell-size distribution should be narrower than the cell-size distribution of the original culture. In cont… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many experimental approaches have been described for synchronizing cells at specific phases of the cell cycle [15], and several common methods involve pharmacological agents acting at various points throughout the cell cycle [16], [17]. However, because of adverse cellular perturbations that can result from exposure to these pharmacological agents [18], we chose to use serum deprivation as the method for synchronizing undifferentiated THP-1 cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many experimental approaches have been described for synchronizing cells at specific phases of the cell cycle [15], and several common methods involve pharmacological agents acting at various points throughout the cell cycle [16], [17]. However, because of adverse cellular perturbations that can result from exposure to these pharmacological agents [18], we chose to use serum deprivation as the method for synchronizing undifferentiated THP-1 cells.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our model system of FL5.12 cells in response to IL-3 is perhaps a superior model for the G0/G1 transition to the more common serum-starvation and refeeding experiments that carry with them the complexity of signals in serum and the concerns of synchronization and re-activation (Cooper and Gonzalez-Hernandez, 2009). While there still exists a significant fraction of cells that loses synchrony in our system along the cell cycle, a significant sub-population of cells remarkably gave rise to major known characteristics and features of each cell cycle phase as evidenced in Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the many critiques of the Standard Model-that methods used to synchronize cells do not synchronize cells [13,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29], that data in support of the standard model have been shown to be not reproducible [15,16], that gene expression variations cannot have any significant affect on passage through the cell cycle [17], that logical problems with the Standard Model have not been addressed [11]-I now add a critique of the use of normalization to present data on gene expression during the division cycle. …”
Section: The Continuum Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whole-culture inhibition methods where cells are growth inhibited and where it is proposed that the cells are synchronized upon release of inhibition do not synchronize cells. These methods have been shown to not synchronize cells by both theoretical analysis [19,23,24] and by numerous experimental analyses [21,[27][28][29]. Even publications that propose that methods such as serum starvation or thymidine inhibition can synchronize cells, these papers often present data that these methods do not synchronize cells [1] when considered in the light of clearly defined criteria for synchronization [19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation