2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.14.054062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Realization of Nonadiabatic Holonomic Single-Qubit Quantum Gates with Optimal Control in a Trapped Ion

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, GQC [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] based on the nonadiabatic geometric phases [4,5] have been proposed to implement robust and high-fidelity quantum gates, which eliminate the restriction of slow evolution. Remarkably, experimental demonstrations for elementary geometric quantum gates have also been achieved on various systems, such as trapped ions [18,19], NMR [20][21][22][23], superconducting quantum circuits [24][25][26][27][28][29][30], and nitrogen vacancy centers [31][32][33][34][35][36], etc. Meanwhile, to further consolidate the geometric robustness, many efforts have been made to make GQC being compatible with various optimal-control techniques, including the composite pulse [37,38], dynamical decoupling [39,40], time-optimal control [41], path optimization [42], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, GQC [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] based on the nonadiabatic geometric phases [4,5] have been proposed to implement robust and high-fidelity quantum gates, which eliminate the restriction of slow evolution. Remarkably, experimental demonstrations for elementary geometric quantum gates have also been achieved on various systems, such as trapped ions [18,19], NMR [20][21][22][23], superconducting quantum circuits [24][25][26][27][28][29][30], and nitrogen vacancy centers [31][32][33][34][35][36], etc. Meanwhile, to further consolidate the geometric robustness, many efforts have been made to make GQC being compatible with various optimal-control techniques, including the composite pulse [37,38], dynamical decoupling [39,40], time-optimal control [41], path optimization [42], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method of getting faster holonomic quantum gates is achieved via shortening the evolution path [40,41]. Besides the gate-time consideration, the pulse shaping technique is also applied in NHQC schemes [42][43][44][45][46] with experimental demonstrations [47][48][49][50][51][52], mainly to strength the gate-robustness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the population of excited state will decrease with the increase of the composite pulse sequence in our S-NHQC, and thus improves both the gate fidelity and robustness. This is distinct from the conventional NHQC schemes [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] with dynamical decoupling pulse [55] and pulse shaping, where the gate robustness is obtained at the cost of decreasing the gate-fidelity. In addition, we compare our CS-NHQC scheme with the conventional dynamical scheme, and our scheme performs better in certain parameters ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the research in this field is extended to investigate and implement the nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation (NHQC) [21,22] based on the non-Abelian geometric phase, as it is faster than the adiabatic case and can naturally be used to construct universal quantum gates. At present, the better robust performance of geometric quantum computation has been theoretically investigated [20,[23][24][25][26][27] and some of them have already been experimentally demonstrated [28][29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%