2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0962-1849(01)80002-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental psychopathology, clinical science, and practice: An irrelevant or indispensable alliance?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
37
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
1
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were excluded from the study if they (a) evidenced limited mental competency or the inability to give informed, written consent; (b) did not currently smoke marijuana (defined by use within the past 30 days); (c) had not experienced a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 1994) defined traumatic event; or (4) had any current Axis-I psychopathology as assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, Non-Patient Version (SCID-NP; First, Spitzer, Gibbon, & Williams, 1995). Focusing on current marijuana users with a traumatic life event exposure, rather than those currently diagnosed with PTSD, was advantageous at this stage of research as the relation between emotional reactivity to trauma and motivational bases for marijuana use could be meaningfully tested without the concern that the results were alternatively due to sequelae of PTSD per se (e.g., chronic stress-related neurobiological changes; Forsyth & Zvolensky, 2002).…”
Section: E T H O D Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were excluded from the study if they (a) evidenced limited mental competency or the inability to give informed, written consent; (b) did not currently smoke marijuana (defined by use within the past 30 days); (c) had not experienced a Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV; American Psychiatric Association [APA], 1994) defined traumatic event; or (4) had any current Axis-I psychopathology as assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, Non-Patient Version (SCID-NP; First, Spitzer, Gibbon, & Williams, 1995). Focusing on current marijuana users with a traumatic life event exposure, rather than those currently diagnosed with PTSD, was advantageous at this stage of research as the relation between emotional reactivity to trauma and motivational bases for marijuana use could be meaningfully tested without the concern that the results were alternatively due to sequelae of PTSD per se (e.g., chronic stress-related neurobiological changes; Forsyth & Zvolensky, 2002).…”
Section: E T H O D Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were excluded on the basis of (1) limited mental competency or the inability to give informed, written consent; (2) current endorsement of suicidality; (3) evidence of current or past psychotic-spectrum symptoms or disorders; and (4) current axis I psychopathology, as assessed by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, Non-Patient Version (SCID-NP; First, Spitzer, Gibbon, & Williams, 1995). These exclusionary criteria help to ensure that any of the observed findings cannot simply be attributed to pre-existing psychological problems rather than the psychological factors of theoretical interest (Forsyth & Zvolensky, 2002).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…64,65 Experimental psychopathology research is conducted in a controlled environment, with sampling of human and nonhuman animals, in order to investigate the etiology, development and maintenance of mental disorders, which could contribute to strategies for prevention and intervention. 65 This approach is at the threshold of two other major areas of Psychology, 1) basic research and 2) clinical psychopathology, but it also has some crucial differences in terms of its object of study and final aim.…”
Section: Experimental Psychopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 In turn, the experimental study of psychopathological processes tries to fill the gap between these two approaches, preserving and maintaining the experimental rigor, while proposing secondary prophylactic interventions. 64 Many studies have utilized the trauma analogue paradigm along with tasks that stimulate or consume data, independent of other base systems. Human memory processing can only be understood using an approach that considers each base system involved and their respective properties: cognitive, neural and behavioral.…”
Section: Experimental Psychopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%