1959
DOI: 10.1016/s0368-1742(59)80029-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Production of Scrapie in Goats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Foster & N. Hunter, unpublished results). Our SSBP/1 results are also in agreement with previous data on SSBP/1-affected goats, which succumbed 420-680 days post-inoculation (Pattison et al, 1959;Pattison & Millson, 1960).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Foster & N. Hunter, unpublished results). Our SSBP/1 results are also in agreement with previous data on SSBP/1-affected goats, which succumbed 420-680 days post-inoculation (Pattison et al, 1959;Pattison & Millson, 1960).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…When a new disease phenotype is seen following passage, it has been difficult therefore to differentiate between host and strain effects, and in particular to know whether there has been strain mutation or adaptation or whether the new host has selected from a mixture of pre-existing strains in the donor. [38][39][40] Our results confirm that not all the pathological features of cloned murine strains are transferred to the sheep host, in which phenotypic variability appears to be dependant of host factors such as Prnp genotype or breed. Although not definitive as the inocula were cloned this phenotypic variability would not appear to be due to the existence of a mixture of strains in the infectious material given to sheep.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The first example is the observation that experimental transmission of a pool of scrapieinfected sheep brains (SSBP/1) to goats resulted in two clinical disease phenotypeseither a 'scratching' or 'drowsy' syndromethat were conserved on subpassage [145,146]. The question arises of whether distinct strain components pre-existed in the original pool and found clinical manifestation in goats, or whether a variant TSE agent emerged upon confrontation to a foreign PrP sequence.…”
Section: Emergence Of a New Strainmentioning
confidence: 99%