2018
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/406/1/012060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental process pressure analysis for model-based manufacturing of composites by resin transfer moulding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This also explains the lower initial pressure in the experiments for higher initial mold gap heights (Figure 8, second and third row). Subsequently, when the preform is infiltrated, the compression resistance of the preform decreases due to lubrication with the resin, as was shown by previous studies [24,25]. The relative difference of the pressure values therefore decreases with ongoing infiltration and, furthermore, with increasing fluid pressure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This also explains the lower initial pressure in the experiments for higher initial mold gap heights (Figure 8, second and third row). Subsequently, when the preform is infiltrated, the compression resistance of the preform decreases due to lubrication with the resin, as was shown by previous studies [24,25]. The relative difference of the pressure values therefore decreases with ongoing infiltration and, furthermore, with increasing fluid pressure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The relative difference of the pressure values therefore decreases with ongoing infiltration and, furthermore, with increasing fluid pressure. To further develop the experiments and simulations, the compensation of the preform compression pressure as proposed by Fauster et al [25] is one possible option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All preforms from Table 1 were investigated with respect to their transverse compaction behavior. They were tested with an UTS 250 tensile test machine from Hegewald & Peschke Meß-und Pr€ uftechnik GmbH utilizing a preform compaction setup [55]. The compaction test setup allowed accurate control of displacement between the two acting faces.…”
Section: Compaction Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%