Until the work of Blake and Cecil (1) lobar pneumoinia had not been produced in the lower animals with any degree of constancy. These authors suicceeded in producing in monkeys (MIacacus Syrichtus and Cebus Captucinus) by means of the intratracheal injection of small quantities of pneumococcus ctulture a lobar pneumonia which in its symptomatology, evolution and pathological histology resembled closely the disease seen in man. This work was repeated by Schobl and Sellards (2), who confirmed the clinical findings of Blake and Cecil but concluded that the pathology of the pulmonary process resembled more nearly the picture of the confluent bronchopneumonia produced by the pneumococcus in the rabbit, than the characteristic lesion in man.Other investigators working with the dog have found that in order to produce pulmonary infection with the pneumococcus not only must the infecting agent be implanted far down into the bronchial tree but that the inoculum must be massive. Lamar and Meltzer (3), using such a method, were successful in establishing in some of their animals lobar consolidation and a disease resembling an abortive lobar pneumonia. Those in which the disease ran a longer course died within two to four days with bacteremia and pyemic complications. One or more lobes showed consolidation which was considered to be similar to that of the human lobar pneumonia. Some of their dogs escaped infection. More recently Coryllos and Birnbaum (4) have employed a modification of this method, spraying large quantities of pneumococcus culture-10 to 15 cc.-into the lung through a bronchoscope either with or without subsequent occlusion of the main bronchtus. This resulted either in a transient infection or a widespread pneumonia accompanied by extensive atelectasis and an ensuing generalized infection usually with a fatal termination.Lobar consolidation has also been produced in rabbits by the intrapulmonary injection of pneumococci with similar (5) (6) or other (7) methods, but the course of the disease in these animals showed neither constancy nor close resemblance to the clinical syndrome of lobar pneumonia.It has been assumed that the antipneumococcal resistance of the dog was much higher than that of man, and hence a correspondingly larger I