ReplyTo our knowledge, our recent study (Ichinose-Kuwahara et al. 2010) is the first to investigate sweat gland responses from the point of view of the sex difference in the effects of physical training during exercise. We have observed a sex difference in the degree of improvement in the sweating response with physical training. That is, the degree of improvement with physical training is smaller in women than in men, and this sex difference became more pronounced with increased exercise intensity. Therefore, the sex differences of sweating response observed in untrained men and women become more remarkable in physically trained subjects. These viewpoints are challenged by Schwiening et al. (2011). They have concluded that the differences of absolute exercise intensity and maximal oxygen uptake (V O2 max ) among groups produced the group differences in sweating rate, i.e. the differences in sweat response reflected only absolute exercise intensity orV O2 max and not the effect of physical training or sex differences. Schwiening et al. (2011) plotV O2 (in millilitres per minute) and the sweat output per gland (SGO) data of all groups in one exponential function [their eqn (3)]. However, the relationship ofV O2 and SGO should be demanded inherently in each group. Therefore, when they extrapolated them to one equation collectively, they ignored the sex differences at that point. The relationship betweenV O2 and SGO in each group is a linear rather than an exponential relationship, within our subjects'V O2 range (Ichinose-Kuwahara et al. 2010). In other words, as a result of overlapping four different regression lines, it appears to be an exponential function. In fact,V O2 values have a high correlation with SGO (r = 0.88-1), when we performed regression analysis in each individual. The slope of the relationship betweenV O2 and SGO is significantly greater in the trained male group than in the other three groups (0.0113 ± 0.0006, 0.0069 ± 0.0008, 0.0078 ± 0.0006 and 0.0055 ± 0.0007 μg per gland min −1 ml −1 min for trained men, untrained men, trained women and untrained women, respectively). For confirmation, we analysed the relationship between absolute exercise intensity (in watts) and SGO, and we obtained same results (r = 0.86-1; 0.1455 ± 0.0098, 0.0931 ± 0.0115, 0.0977 ± 0.0082 and 0.0644 ± 0.0078 μg p e r gland minfor trained men, untrained men, trained women and untrained women, respectively). These results suggest that a remarkable effect of training is observed in men and that there is a sex difference of the training effect, even if we analysed sweating response witḣ V O2 (or absolute exercise intensity). As reported by Schwiening et al. (2011), one apparent exponential function could be fitted by analysing the groups with different slopes together. However, to do so would risk missing potential information hidden in the data. The sweat response during exercise is difficult to analyse, because it is influenced by various factors, including the degree of thermogenesis during relatively intense exercise, th...