A Companion to Experimental Philosophy 2016
DOI: 10.1002/9781118661666.ch33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental Philosophy of Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The traditional literature-based methods that we have in mind are ones where the philosopher engages very deeply with a subset of the scientific literature, especially literature which she deems relevant and read in depth. AsMachery (2016) explains, bibliometric and cliometric techniques provide philosophers with other ways of exploring scientific literatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional literature-based methods that we have in mind are ones where the philosopher engages very deeply with a subset of the scientific literature, especially literature which she deems relevant and read in depth. AsMachery (2016) explains, bibliometric and cliometric techniques provide philosophers with other ways of exploring scientific literatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some case studies may be based upon only a few publications, while others reference archive materials and biographies of leading actors. And while quantitative data and methods of analysis can be used in conjunction with case studies (Morgan, 2012, p. 688), such an approach is rare in philosophy of science (Machery, 2016).…”
Section: The Methodology Of Case Studies In Philosophy Of Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental philosophy (X-phi) of science is a relatively new approach that aims to overcome this problem. Specifi cally, it uses survey-experimental instruments to generate data about scientists' judgments on conceptual issues, in a hypotheses-oriented and controlled fashion, thereby complementing or confronting the kinds of evidence mentioned here regarding how scientists understand and use particular concepts ( Griffi ths and Stotz, 2008 ;Machery, 2016 ). Until very recently, experimental philosophy has not been much applied in the philosophy of science, despite its popularity in other fi elds of philosophy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%