2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2012.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental performance study of a proposed desiccant based air conditioning system

Abstract: An experimental investigation on the performance of a proposed hybrid desiccant based air conditioning system referred as HDBAC is introduced in this paper. HDBAC is mainly consisted of a liquid desiccant dehumidification unit integrated with a vapor compression system (VCS). The VCS unit has a cooling capacity of 5.27 kW and uses 134a as refrigerant. Calcium chloride (CaCl2) solution is used as the working desiccant material. HDBAC system is used to serve low sensible heat factor applications. The effect of d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An experimental study show that average primary energy ratio was 1.6 and 30% of energy saving was achieved by liquid solar desiccant cooling system [24]. In another similar experimental study, results show that COP of the desiccant system increased about 54% over vapor compression system with reheat and achieved 33-60% energy savings [25]. In an economic comparison of proposed and conventional liquid desiccant system, results show that payback period of proposed system to return initial cost was 7 years and 8 months [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…An experimental study show that average primary energy ratio was 1.6 and 30% of energy saving was achieved by liquid solar desiccant cooling system [24]. In another similar experimental study, results show that COP of the desiccant system increased about 54% over vapor compression system with reheat and achieved 33-60% energy savings [25]. In an economic comparison of proposed and conventional liquid desiccant system, results show that payback period of proposed system to return initial cost was 7 years and 8 months [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The performance of the DW depends on several parameters which include inlet and outlet process air temperature and humidity, inlet reactivating air temperature and humidity, face velocity of the two air streams, and size of the regeneration segment [57]. Cooling unit: which could be an evaporative cooler or a cold coil with capability to remove the sensible heat while the desiccant handle the latent load [58]. Regeneration heat source: a variety of energy sources can be utilized for this purpose such as solar energy, waste heat, and natural gas heating [59].…”
Section: Principle Of Solid Desiccant Coolingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparative study on the performance of a counter-flow and cross-flow dehumidifier was conducted by Cho et al 16 and they concluded that the counter-flow dehumidifier showed better performance, the cross-flow dehumidifier was more stable, and eliminated the liquid carry-over issue. An experimental investigation of desiccant-based hybrid air conditioning system, using CaCl 2 as a desiccant was performed by Bassuoni et al 17 The proposed system showed 54% greater coefficient of performance (COP) compared to VCR. To improve the performance of CaCl 2 , a cooling medium within the structured packing was provided and it was observed that its dehumidification effectiveness was improved from 0.55 to 0.706, and its moisture removal rate was improved from 0.0034 kg/kg of dry air to 0.005 kg/kg of dry air.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%