1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf00223395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental observations of a bifurcated buoyant plume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SO 2 -NO x ratios for the two plumes are similar, and neither plume was observed upwind of the power plant, which leads us to believe that both plumes originate from the Conesville power plant. Since the power-plant stacks are much closer than the distance between the center of the plumes (∼3 km), the plume must have bifurcated either due to complex flows at the stack (Fanaki, 1975) or due to topographic effects from hills in the region. The boundary layer at the Conesville power generation facility was very stable until sunrise, ∼5 h before the observations were made, which may favor bifurcation of the plume at the stack.…”
Section: Conesvillementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SO 2 -NO x ratios for the two plumes are similar, and neither plume was observed upwind of the power plant, which leads us to believe that both plumes originate from the Conesville power plant. Since the power-plant stacks are much closer than the distance between the center of the plumes (∼3 km), the plume must have bifurcated either due to complex flows at the stack (Fanaki, 1975) or due to topographic effects from hills in the region. The boundary layer at the Conesville power generation facility was very stable until sunrise, ∼5 h before the observations were made, which may favor bifurcation of the plume at the stack.…”
Section: Conesvillementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At cross section B, the edge of the plume is sheared off by the wind thus resulting in a kidney-shaped cross section. Thereafter at cross section C where the plume is fully bent-over, the dilution process is dominated by the interaction between the two counter-rotating line vortices and the ambient crossflow [43] 33%, even though the associated dissipation rates were approximately two orders of magnitude smaller than the plume turbulence dissipation rates. Not surprisingly, the turbulent crossflow was also found to decrease the plume rise height, which can be accounted for by adopting a modified entrainment coefficient, i.e.…”
Section: Ground Heating Obstaclementioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to middle clouds and upper-level winds, the plume height appeared to be at the level of 2.5 -3.0 km. Fanaki (1975) suggested, however, that two plumes from a tall stack may travel downwind either at the same height or at different heights. Figure 3 shows 5-day forward trajectories starting at Augustine Island.…”
Section: Other Inputsmentioning
confidence: 99%