1975
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(75)80234-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Experimental observation of critical depolarization in carbon dioxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several other effects can be shown to become possible in addition to those mentioned above: (1) far enough from the critical point, the 1.5-scattering alone causes the depolarization ratio to increase with temperature by the law ∆ ∝ β, typical of the true double scattering mechanism; (2) the joint action of the 1.5-scattering and the true double scattering mechanisms causes the divergence of ∆ with β to become stronger in the temperature range τ 10 −3 (such an increase was observed in [7], but was attributed to triple light scattering); (3) subsequently, the increase of ∆ may change to a decrease at τ 10 −4 (such a decrease was indeed observed in [20], but was subjected to question). The details of the pertinent analysis will be published elsewhere.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several other effects can be shown to become possible in addition to those mentioned above: (1) far enough from the critical point, the 1.5-scattering alone causes the depolarization ratio to increase with temperature by the law ∆ ∝ β, typical of the true double scattering mechanism; (2) the joint action of the 1.5-scattering and the true double scattering mechanisms causes the divergence of ∆ with β to become stronger in the temperature range τ 10 −3 (such an increase was observed in [7], but was attributed to triple light scattering); (3) subsequently, the increase of ∆ may change to a decrease at τ 10 −4 (such a decrease was indeed observed in [20], but was subjected to question). The details of the pertinent analysis will be published elsewhere.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, in view of formulae (17), (19), (20), and (22), the relative magnitude of I 1.5 , as compared to those of I 1 , I 2 , and I d , changes with temperature as…”
Section: Estimates With the Van Der Waals Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two-body double scattering (5.33) belongs naturally with a four-body term coming from the corrected first term of figure 4 f .In a first, somewhat intuitive, microscopic tr macroscopic multiple scattering Oxtoby & Gelbart (1974a, b) have already analysed contributions that may be said to be contained in this four-body term. These authors, and subsequently Boots et al (1976) give estimates of the contribution to double scattering Experimental depolarization studies, which appear to illustrate the behaviour of macroscopic multiple scattering close to the critical point, have been published by Reith & Swiney (1975) for xenon and by Trappeniers et al (1975) for carbon dioxide. We find the theoretical situation close to the critical point so complicated that at most only a qualitative interpretation is possible there.…”
Section: R(xmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Une etude du meme type a d'ailleurs ete faite sur CO2 au point critique par Trappeniers et coll. [38]. Ils mettent en evidence la diffusion multiple, c'est-a-dire les termes tres longue portee de l'interaction D.I.D.…”
Section: Etude De La Depolarisation En Fonction Deunclassified